Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Posterior tibial slope (PTS) has been identified as a possible modifiable risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) failure. However, the findings in the literature are inconsistent. This may be explained by several different reasons, including different measurement methods, differing definitions of ACLR failure, and possible inclusion of suboptimal films.Purpose:To compare PTS values obtained using plain radiographs (XR-PTS) in a young (≤21 years of age), skeletally mature patient population with those obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as to quantify the number of suboptimal lateral knee radiographs obtained across an integrated health care system and determine the potential effect of including these radiographs on summary statistics of XR-PTS.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Skeletally mature adolescent and young adult patients ≤21 years of age were identified from the ACLR registry of Kaiser Permanente. The cases of concern were patients requiring revision ACLR. The controls were patients who had an ACLR and did not require a revision procedure. The XR-PTS measurements were made on plain radiographs by a single blinded reviewer. These results were compared with measurements obtained using MRI. The quality of each plain radiograph was evaluated by measuring posterior/distal femoral condylar overlap and length of tibial diaphysis captured on the radiograph. Summary statistics with and without inclusion of measurements made on suboptimal radiographs were calculated.Results:Of the initial 634 patients with ACLR (317 case-control pairs), 561 (88.5%) had radiographs available and were included for the analysis comparing radiograph to MRI slope measurements. For the evaluation of slope between case and control pairs with radiograph information available, there were 257 case-control pairs; there were 124 pairs when those with suboptimal radiographs were excluded. There was no difference in MRI-measured lateral tibial posterior slope or medial tibial posterior slope for the 257 case-control pairs with XR-PTS information and for the 124 pairs with optimal radiographs. XR-PTS in the revision cohort was significantly steeper than in the control group when suboptimal radiographs were included in the analysis. There was no difference when patients with suboptimal radiographs were excluded. PTS measurements made on plain radiographs were larger than those made on MRI. There was a poor correlation between measurements made using these 2 modalities (r = 0.22 for radiograph and medial PTS).Conclusion:This study did not find a significantly steeper XR-PTS in patients who had to undergo revision ACLR when suboptimal radiographs were not included in the analysis. The present study's results confirmed the findings from a previous study of the same patient population that used MRI. However, there was poor correlation between PTS measurements made using plain radiograph and MRI.

Common radiographic indices used to measure patellar height do not consistently identify patella alta and lack interchangeability between measurements

No Correlation Exists Between Tibial- and Femoral-Based Measurements of Patella Alta in a Population With Chronic Patellofemoral Pain or Instability Undergoing Patella Distalization

Patellar height measurements: Insall–Salvati ratio is most reliable method

Different Radiological Indices of Patellar Height Predict Patients' Diverse Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Patella height measurements in patients with patellofemoral instability: the power to predict patella height indices

Reliability and modality analysis of patellar height measurement in pediatric knee

Normal values of the axial patellotrochlear overlap on MRI: Good correlation with patellotrochlear index in patients with no patellofemoral pathology

Patellar height: an important parameter in knee MRI associated with tendinopathy, quadriceps fat pad edema (QFPE), anterior cruciate ligament mucoid degeneration (ACL-MD), and lateral cartilage damage

Evaluation of Differences in Patellar Height After Patellar Stabilization Procedures Not Intended to Address Patella Alta: A Multicenter Study

Posterior Tibial Slope Measurements of the Medial and Lateral Plateaus Vary Widely Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging And Computed Tomography

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Improves Patella Alta

Reliability and Validity of an Ultrasound-Derived Measure for Axial Patellofemoral Alignment

Reliability of the Tibial Tubercle–Roman Arch Distance for Evaluating Tibial Tubercle Malposition and Predicting Patellar Dislocation Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Fully Automated Measurement of the Insall-Salvati Ratio with Artificial Intelligence

Investigating patellar motion using weight-bearing dynamic CT: normative values and morphological considerations for healthy volunteers

Arthroscopic Patellofemoral Measurements Can Reliably Assess Patellar Instability

Posterior Tibial Slope Measured on Plain Radiograph Versus MRI and Its Association With Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Case-Control Study

Variability Between Full-Length Lateral Radiographs and Standard Short Knee Radiographs When Evaluating Posterior Tibial Slope in Revision ACL Patients

Analyzing Alignment Error in Tibial Tuberosity–Trochlear Groove Distance in Clinical Scans Using 2D and 3D Methods

Does Patellar Height Influence Range of Motion and Anterior Knee Pain after Distal Femur Endoprosthesis Reconstruction?

The Influence of Anterior Translation of the Tibia with Patellar Height Measurements in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Insufficient Knee