760. Multidisciplinary Education in Substance Use Disorder Centers Improves HIV Prevention Knowledge and Practice: BRIDGE PrEP: Building Bridges to Reach People Who Inject Drugs with the Goal of Employing PrEP for HIV Prevention

Amanda Glazar,Becky K Carney,Mara S Simpson,Susan Daniels,Gregory S Felzien
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.821
2023-11-27
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Abstract Background Around 10% of new HIV infections in the US are attributed to injection drug use or male-to-male contact and injected drug use; syringe sharing is the second riskiest behavior for contracting HIV. For many, substance use disorder (SUD) treatment is the primary point of access for receiving HIV-related services. A 2021 survey showed gaps in HIV prevention knowledge and practice among SUD center staff but also interest in education (Fig 1). The BRIDGE PrEP program is a grassroots initiative designed to educate and motivate SUD center staff to increase their clients’ awareness of and access to HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) services. Methods Ten live continuing medical education (CME) meetings supported by an educational grant from Gilead Sciences, Inc were conducted at SUD centers between August 2022 and May 2023. The 1-hour meetings provided didactic information, real-world insights, faculty-learner interactions, local networking, and take-away print and online staff/patient-education resources (Fig 2). Program goals include:1.Increase HIV testing of people who inject drugs 2. Educate SUD center staff regarding PrEP harm-reduction practices and 3.Build linkages between SUD staff, PrEP providers, and HIV-care networks within local/regional systems. Moore’s Level 1-5 (self-reported) outcomes (Fig 3) were collected via pre-, post-, and 6-week follow-up surveys evaluating knowledge and self-reported frequencies of recommended HIV prevention practice behaviors. Results To date, there have been 154 participants representing a diverse multidisciplinary learner group extending beyond the clinician-only audience typical of many CME programs (Fig 4). Increases in knowledge were demonstrated across topic areas (Fig 5), and participants reported intent to improve HIV prevention-related practices following the activity (Fig 6). To date, follow-up surveys report specific actions taken on individual and system levels to improve HIV screening and prevention (Fig 7). Conclusion Positive outcomes related to HIV prevention knowledge and practice among SUD center staff have the potential to impact many at-risk individuals. Additionally, follow-up surveys suggest that improved awareness is prompting collaboration and system-level changes driven by participants (Fig 8). Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?