Clinical outcome and prognostic factors of T4N0M0 colon cancer after R0 resection: A retrospective study

Bang Liu,Zhao-Xiong Zhang,Xin-Yang Nie,Wei-Lin Sun,Yong-Jia Yan,Wei-Hua Fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1869
2024-05-08
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Abstract:BACKGROUND Paradoxically, patients with T4N0M0 (stage II, no lymph node metastasis) colon cancer have a worse prognosis than those with T2N1-2M0 (stage III). However, no previous report has addressed this issue. AIM To screen prognostic risk factors for T4N0M0 colon cancer and construct a prognostic nomogram model for these patients. METHODS Two hundred patients with T4N0M0 colon cancer were treated at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital between January 2017 and December 2021, of which 112 patients were assigned to the training cohort, and the remaining 88 patients were assigned to the validation cohort. Differences between the training and validation groups were analyzed. The training cohort was subjected to multivariate analysis to select prognostic risk factors for T4N0M0 colon cancer, followed by the construction of a nomogram model. RESULTS The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 86.2% and 74.4% for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Enterostomy (P = 0.000), T stage (P = 0.001), right hemicolon (P = 0.025), irregular review (P = 0.040), and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) (P = 0.011) were independent risk factors of OS in patients with T4N0M0 colon cancer. A nomogram model with good concordance and accuracy was constructed. CONCLUSION Enterostomy, T stage, right hemicolon, irregular review, and CA199 were independent risk factors for OS in patients with T4N0M0 colon cancer. The nomogram model exhibited good agreement and accuracy.
oncology,gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?