Abstract:Software defect prediction is one of the most active fields in software engineering. Recently, some experts have proposed the Just-in-time Defect Prediction Technology. Just-in-time Defect prediction technology has become a hot topic in defect prediction due to its directness and fine granularity. This technique can predict whether a software defect exists in every code change submitted by a developer. In addition, the method has the advantages of high speed and easy tracking. However, the biggest challenge is that the prediction accuracy of Just-in-Time software is affected by the data set category imbalance. In most cases, 20% of defects in software engineering may be in 80% of modules, and code changes that do not cause defects account for a large proportion. Therefore, there is an imbalance in the data set, that is, the imbalance between a few classes and a majority of classes, which will affect the classification prediction effect of the model. Furthermore, because most features do not result in code changes that cause defects, it is not easy to achieve the desired results in practice even though the model is highly predictive. In addition, the features of the data set contain many irrelevant features and redundant features, which are invalid data, which will increase the complexity of the prediction model and reduce the prediction efficiency. To improve the prediction efficiency of Just-in-Time defect prediction technology. We trained a just-in-time defect prediction model using six open source projects from different fields based on random forest classification. LIME Interpretability technique is used to explain the model to a certain extent. By using explicable methods to extract meaningful, relevant features, the experiment can only need 45% of the original work to explain the prediction results of the prediction model and identify critical features through explicable techniques, and only need 96% of the original work to achieve this goal, under the premise of ensuring specific prediction effects. Therefore, the application of interpretable techniques can significantly reduce the workload of developers and improve work efficiency.

Exploring better alternatives to size metrics for explainable software defect prediction

An empirical study on software defect prediction with a simplified metric set

Causally Remove Negative Confound Effects of Size Metric for Software Defect Prediction

Explainable Software Defect Prediction from Cross Company Project Metrics Using Machine Learning

Understanding machine learning software defect predictions

Combined Classifier for Cross-Project Defect Prediction: an Extended Empirical Study.

Interpretability application of the Just-in-Time software defect prediction model

A software defect prediction method with metric compensation based on feature selection and transfer learning

Deep Learning for Just-In-Time Defect Prediction

Just-in-Time Defect Prediction Technology Based on Interpretability Technology

Compressed C4.5 Models for Software Defect Prediction

Predicting the precise number of software defects: Are we there yet?

A Novel Software Defect Prediction Based on Atomic Class-Association Rule Mining

How Far We Have Progressed in the Journey? An Examination of Cross-Project Defect Prediction.

An Improved Confounding Effect Model for Software Defect Prediction

An Empirical Study of Model-Agnostic Techniques for Defect Prediction Models

Establishing a Software Defect Prediction Model Via Effective Dimension Reduction.

Discriminating features-based cost-sensitive approach for software defect prediction

A Practical Approach to Explaining Defect Proneness of Code Commits by Causal Discovery

Revisiting the Impact of Dependency Network Metrics on Software Defect Prediction

Software Defect Prediction Based on Stacked Contractive Autoencoder and Multi-objective Optimization