Abstract:Study objective: To show how the evaluation for endometriosis can be included in the routine pelvic ultrasound examination. Design: Stepwise narrated video demonstration of the sonographic evaluation for endometriosis in routine pelvic ultrasound following the recommended sonographic approach published in the 2016 consensus paper by the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group [1]. Setting: Endometriosis is a common and often debilitating gynecological disorder that affects 5-10% of women [2]. The prevalence is even higher among women with symptoms of endometriosis [2], which include chronic pelvic pain, acquired dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia, menorrhagia, abnormal bleeding, and infertility. Approximately 80% of women who have endometriosis have superficial lesions, whereas 20% have deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE; [3]). Laparoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing endometriosis, because it allows the diagnosis of all forms of endometriosis and often immediate removal of superficial endometriosis. The removal of DIE is considerably more complicated and usually cannot be completed unless it was diagnosed preoperatively. The technique to diagnose DIE with transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) was first described in detail in 2009 [4]. Since then, the accuracy of TVUS for the prediction of DIE has been well established in the literature [5-7]. TVUS is widely used as a first-line investigation for women with gynecological symptoms. The inclusion of an assessment for endometriosis in the routine pelvic ultrasound allows earlier diagnosis and better surgical outcomes for all women with DIE. Interventions: The evaluation for endometriosis in routine pelvic ultrasound based on the IDEA consensus promotes a 4-step dynamic ultrasound approach [1]: (1) routine evaluation of uterus and adnexa with particular attention for sonographic signs of adenomyosis and the presence or absence of endometriomas; (2) evaluation of transvaginal sonographic 'soft markers' such as site-specific tenderness and ovarian mobility; (3) assessment of status of pouch of Douglas using the real-time ultrasound-based "sliding sign;" and (4) assessment of DIE nodules in the anterior and posterior compartments, which involves assessment of the bladder, vaginal vault, uterosacral ligaments, and bowel, including rectum, rectosigmoid junction, and sigmoid colon. Because 5-10% of women with DIE also have ureteric endometriosis, it is useful to assess the kidneys. Silent hydronephrosis is easily identified in 50-60% of patients with ureteric involvement. Although it is possible to identify DIE involving the ureters more directly, this requires more advanced skills, and further studies are still needed to better define the accuracy of ureteric DIE detection by TVUS [8-10]. Conclusion: Traditionally, only pathologies of the uterus and ovaries are assessed during a routine pelvic ultrasound. Here we demonstrate that the routine ultrasound examination can easily be extended beyond the uterus and ovaries into the posterior and anterior pelvic compartments to evaluate structural mobility and to look for deep infiltrating endometriotic nodules, wherewith women suffering from DIE can benefit from a preoperative diagnosis and subsequently, a single, well-planned procedure in the hands of a well-prepared team.

The “Triangle Sign”: A Novel Dynamic Ultrasound Technique for Identifying an Obliterated Cul-De-Sac in Patients with a Retroverted Uterus

EP24.13: Advancing endometriosis mapping: quantifying sliding sign in transvaginal sonography to identify Pouch of Douglas obliteration

VP05.17: Learning curve for the ultrasound detection of uterosacral ligaments and torus uterinus deep endometriosis: repeatability and reproducibility study

The Role of Advanced Techniques

Laparoscopic mobilization of the rectosigmoid and excision of the obliterated cul-de-sac

The Benefit of Transvaginal Elastography in Detecting Deep Endometriosis: A Feasibility Study

Sonographic Evaluation for Endometriosis in Routine Pelvic Ultrasound

Can anyone screen for deep infiltrating endometriosis with transvaginal ultrasound?

Learning curve in the detection of ovarian and deep endometriosis by using Magnetic Resonance: comparison with surgical results

Hysteroscopy versus Three-dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasonography for the Detection of Endometrial Cavity Abnormalities

The Clinical Significance of Real-Time 3-D Transperineal Ultrasound in the Treatment of Postpartum Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Using a Combined Magnetic and Electrical Repair Approach

Effectiveness of ultrasound for endometriosis diagnosis

Indirect and atypical imaging signals of endometriosis: A wide range of manifestations

Noninvasive diagnostic imaging for endometriosis part 1: a systematic review of recent developments in ultrasound, combination imaging, and artificial intelligence

Best Practices: Ultrasound Versus MRI in the Assessment of Pelvic Endometriosis

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and MRI in the Mapping of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis Using the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) Consensus

Diagnostic and management dilemmas of pregnancies at the utero‐tubal junction: A case series and management algorithm

Initial Accuracy of and Learning Curve for Transvaginal Ultrasound with Bowel Preparation for Deep Endometriosis in a US Tertiary Care Center

Intraoperative transvaginal ultrasound to standardize bowel endometriosis shaving

EP24.05: Prospective study: transvaginal ultrasound for endometriosis, incorporating IDEA consensus and novel superficial endometriosis inclusion

Learning curve for the detection of pouch of Douglas obliteration and deep endometriosis of the rectum in gynaecological sonology trainees