The Effect of Electrolyte Composition on the Performance of a Single‐Cell Iron–Chromium Flow Battery

Nico Mans,Henning M. Krieg,Derik J. van der Westhuizen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202300238

2023-12-26

Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research

Abstract:Flow batteries are ideal for large‐scale energy storage in renewable energy systems. Although the iron–chromium redox flow battery is cost‐effective, it has a low storage capacity and high decay rate. Optimising the electrolyte composition (1.3 m FeCl2, 1.4 m CrCl3 in 1.0 m HCl) increases storage capacity to 24.4 Ah L−1 and decreases decay rate to 0.3% h−1, while maintaining constant efficiencies over 50 cycles. Flow batteries are promising for large‐scale energy storage in intermittent renewable energy technologies. While the iron–chromium redox flow battery (ICRFB) is a low‐cost flow battery, it has a lower storage capacity and a higher capacity decay rate than the all‐vanadium RFB. Herein, the effect of electrolyte composition (active species and supporting electrolyte concentrations), Fe/Cr molar ratio, and supporting electrolyte type (HCl and H2SO4) on the performance (current efficiency (CE), voltage efficiency (VE), energy efficiency, discharge capacity, and capacity decay) of an ICRFB is investigated. The storage capacity of the optimum electrolyte (1.3 m FeCl2, 1.4 m CrCl3, 5.0 mm Bi2O3 in 1.0 m HCl) is 40% higher (from 17.5 to 24.4 Ah L−1), while the capacity decay rate is tenfold lower (from 3.0 to 0.3% h−1) than the performance of the previously used 1.0 m FeCl2, 1.0 m CrCl3 in 3.0 m HCl. At the optimum Fe and Cr concentrations and ratio in 0.5 m HCl, a near constant CE (92.3%), VE (78.7%), and EE (72.6%) are obtained over 50 cycles. The significantly higher capacity decay when using 1.0 m H2SO4 (1.6% h−1) compared to 1.0 m HCl (0.3% h−1) confirms that HCl is the more suitable supporting electrolyte.

English Else