Abstract:Purpose Identifying the flow regime is a prerequisite for accurately modeling two-phase flow. This paper aims to introduce a comprehensive data-driven workflow for flow regime identification. Design/methodology/approach A numerical two-phase flow model was validated against experimental data and was used to generate dynamic pressure signals for three different flow regimes. First, four distinct methods were used for feature extraction: discrete wavelet transform (DWT), empirical mode decomposition, power spectral density and the time series analysis method. Kernel Fisher discriminant analysis (KFDA) was used to simultaneously perform dimensionality reduction and machine learning (ML) classification for each set of features. Finally, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method was applied to make the workflow explainable. Findings The results highlighted that the DWT + KFDA method exhibited the highest testing and training accuracy at 95.2% and 88.8%, respectively. Results also include a virtual flow regime map to facilitate the visualization of features in two dimension. Finally, SHAP analysis showed that minimum and maximum values extracted at the fourth and second signal decomposition levels of DWT are the best flow-distinguishing features. Practical implications This workflow can be applied to opaque pipes fitted with pressure sensors to achieve flow assurance and automatic monitoring of two-phase flow occurring in many process industries. Originality/value This paper presents a novel flow regime identification method by fusing dynamic pressure measurements with ML techniques. The authors' novel DWT + KFDA method demonstrates superior performance for flow regime identification with explainability.

Two-phase flow regime identification using multi-method feature extraction and explainable kernel Fisher discriminant analysis

Flow regime classification using various dimensionality reduction methods and AutoML

Flow Regime Identification of Mini-Pipe Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow Based on Textural Feature Series

Flow Pattern Identification Based on EMD and LS-SVM for Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow in a Minichannel

Flow regime detection of mini-pipe gas-liquid two-phase flow based on PCA and SVM

Flow Regime Identification Of Gas-Solid Fluidized Bed Based On Multi-Sensor Information Fusion

Identification of Horizontal Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow Regime using Deep Learning

Flow pattern identification for small channel gas-liquid two-phase flow based on EMD

Flow Regime Identification in Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Horizontal Pipe by Deep Learning

Flow Regime Identification in Horizontal Pneumatic Conveying by Nonintrusive Acoustic Emission Detection

Visual identification of oscillatory two-phase flow with complex flow patterns

Application of Empirical Mode Decomposition and Wavelet Analysis to Small Channel Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow Pattern Identification

Flow Regime Identification Using Pressure Fluctuation Signals in an Aerated Vessel Stirred

Flow Regimes Identification-based Multidomain Features for Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Horizontal Pipe

Flow Pattern Identification Method of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Ductule Based on New C4 D

Two-phase flow regime identification based on the liquid-phase velocity information and machine learning

Numerical Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow Regime Identification in a Horizontal Pipe Using Dynamic Pressure Data

Flow regime identification of oil-water two-phase flow based on HHT and SVM

Flow Regime Identification of Gas-liquid Two-phase Flow Based on HHT

Accurate Flow Regime Classification and Void Fraction Measurement in Two-Phase Flowmeters Using Frequency-Domain Feature Extraction and Neural Networks

Identification Method of Gas-liquid Two-Phase Flow Regime Based on Empirical Mode Decomposition and Probabilistic Neural Network