Abstract:Background, aim, and scopeCarbon footprint (CF) has become a hot topic as public awareness of climate change is placing demands on manufacturers to declare the climate impact of their products. Calculating the CF of food products is complex and associated with unavoidable uncertainty due to the inherent variability of natural processes. This study quantifies the uncertainty of a common food product and discusses the results in relation to different types of CF systems for food product labelling.Materials and methodsA detailed LCI with global warming potential as the only impact category was performed on King Edward table potatoes grown in the Östergötland region of Sweden. Parameters were described using one probability distribution for spatial and temporal variation and one separate distribution describing measuring/data uncertainty, allowing the effect of parameter resolution on CF uncertainty to be studied. Monte Carlo simulation was used to quantify the overall uncertainty. The influence of individual parameters on the CF was analysed and differences in CF for food products from different production systems, with and without climate impact reduction rules, were simulated.ResultsThe potato CF fell in the range 0.10–0.16 kg CO2e per kilogram of potatoes with 95% certainty for an arbitrary year and field. Emissions of N2O from soil dominated the CF uncertainty. Locking the temporal variation to a specific year lowered the uncertainty range by 19%. Parameter collection on a spatial scale of one field did not reduce the uncertainty. The most sensitive parameters were the yield, the soil humus content and the emissions factors for N2O emissions from soil. Potatoes grown according to climate rules lowered the CF by 9% with a probability of 53% for an arbitrary year and field.DiscussionThe importance of yield, which proved to be the most influential parameter, is a common characteristic of agricultural products in general, since the accumulated emissions from a cultivated area are divided across the yield from that area. Maximising the yield reduces the CF but could have negative impacts on other environmental aspects. The purpose of the CF labelling scheme, together with uncertainty analysis, needs to be considered when determining how the CF should be calculated, as an average or for a specific year, farm, field, region, etc.ConclusionsThe CF of a potato crop calculated for an arbitrary year and field varied between approximately -17% and +30% of the average value with 95% certainty, showing that uncertainty analysis in the design, calculation and evaluation of food product CF labelling schemes is important to ensure fair comparisons.Recommendations and perspectivesSimilar studies comparing different production systems for the same type of product and products from different categories, on large and small scale depending on the purpose of the CF system, are needed in order to determine how the CF of food products can be compared and the precision with which data have to be collected in order to allow fair and effective comparison of the CF of food products.

Applicability of Carbon Footprint as Indicator for Environmental Performance of Food Products

Life cycle-carbon footprints for environmental performance/labeling of crop-based food products: analyses of complementary functional units and hotspots

Limitations of Carbon Footprint as Indicator of Environmental Sustainability

Revisiting mass, economic value, quality-based functional units in life cycle assessment of foods towards environmental benchmarking

Product carbon footprints and their uncertainties in comparative decision contexts

The Carbon Catalogue, carbon footprints of 866 commercial products from 8 industry sectors and 5 continents

Large-Scale Microanalysis of U.S. Household Food Carbon Footprints and Reduction Potentials

Where Has Carbon Footprint Research Gone?

How Much Do Front-Of-Pack Labels Correlate with Food Environmental Impacts?

Comparative Study on Carbon Footprint Assessment of Rice-Wheat Production System

Modelling CF of Tobacco Industry Based on PLC Across the Supply Chain

Integrating health, nutrition, and environmental impacts of foods: a life cycle impact assessment and modelling analysis of foods in Canada

Assessing between and within Product Group Variance of Environmental Efficiency of Swiss Agriculture Using Life Cycle Assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis

Assessing the potential of GHG emissions for the textile sector: A baseline study

Sustainable Development in the Agri-Food Sector in Terms of the Carbon Footprint: A Review

Uncertainties in the carbon footprint of food products: a case study on table potatoes

A Comparative Analysis of Relevant Crop Carbon Footprint Calculators, with Reference to Cotton Production in Australia

Interrogating greenhouse gas emissions of different dietary structures by using a new food equivalent incorporated in life cycle assessment method

Carbon emissions embodied in product value chains and the role of Life Cycle Assessment in curbing them

Food Compass and the challenge of sustainability on the route towards healthful diets

The link between product service lifetime and GHG emissions: A comparative study for different consumer products