Structural, morphological, and kinetic studies of β-amyloid peptide aggregation on self-assembled monolayers.

Lingyun Liu,Jun Zhao,Nilam Shah,F. Zhou,Chao Zhao,Jie Zheng,Chengshan Wang,Lingyan Li,Qiuming Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cp21156k
2011-09-07
Abstract:The misfolding and aggregation of β-amyloid peptides (Aβ) into amyloid fibrils, a process that has been pathologically linked to the onset of Alzheimer's disease, is dependent on the presence of a heterogeneous surface (e.g., cell membrane). Understanding of the kinetics of amyloid fibril formation and associated structural transition from monomers to intermediates and eventually to fibrils is critical for the development of viable therapeutic agents. In this work, using circular dichroism (CD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we studied the adsorption, aggregation, and conformational changes of Aβ(1-42) from fresh monomers to fully grown fibrils on four model self-assembled monolayers (SAMs): hydrophobic CH(3)-terminated SAM, hydrophilic OH-terminated SAM, negatively charged COOH-terminated SAMs, and positively charged NH(2)-terminated SAM. The seeding effect of Aβ(1-42) on the kinetics of Aβ aggregation on different SAMs is also examined. The CD, AFM, and SPR data show that all of these SAMs greatly accelerate the formation of β-sheets and amyloid fibrils through surface-enhanced interactions, but Aβ(1-42) peptides preferentially adsorb on a hydrophobic CH(3)-SAM and a positively charged NH(2)-SAM with much stronger interactions than on a hydrophilic OH-SAM and a negatively charged COOH-SAM. MD simulations further reveal that hydrophobic interactions present a general driving force for Aβ adsorption on all SAMs. As Aβ aggregates grow into larger species by packing hydrophobic C-terminals to form a hydrophobic core while exposing hydrophilic and negatively charged N-terminals to solution, electrostatic interactions become more strengthened when they interact with the SAMs especially for the COOH-SAM and the NH(2)-SAM. Thus, both hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions contribute differently to different Aβ-SAM systems and to different aggregation stages. A postulated mechanism is proposed to describe the structure and kinetics of Aβ aggregation from aqueous solution to the SAMs, providing valuable insights into Aβ aggregation on biological cell membranes.
Chemistry,Medicine,Materials Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?