Implementing Precision Medicine for Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Insights from The DCM Consortium
Elizabeth Jordan,Hanyu Ni,Patricia K Parker,Daniel D Kinnamon,Anjali T. Owens,Brian D. Lowes,Chetan Shenoy,Cindy M. Martin,Daniel Judge,Daniel Philip Fishbein,Douglas Stoller,Elina Minami,Evan Kransdorf,Frank Smart,Garrie Joseph Haas,Gordon S Huggins,Gregory A Ewald,Jamie Diamond,Jane Wilcox,Javier Jimenez,Jessica Wang,Jose A Tallaj,Mark H. Drazner,Mark R. Hofmeyer,Matthew T. Wheeler,Omar Wever-Pinzon,Palak Shah,Stephen Gottlieb,Stuart D. Katz,Supriya Shore,W. H. Wilson Tang,Ray E Hershberger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.22.24317816
2024-11-26
Abstract:Background: Clinical genetic evaluation of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is implemented variably or not at all. Identifying needs and barriers to genetic evaluations will enable strategies to enhance precision medicine care.
Methods: An online survey was conducted in June 2024 among cardiologist investigators of the DCM Consortium from US advanced heart failure/transplant (HF/TX) programs to collect demographics, training, program characteristics, genetic evaluation practices for DCM, and implementation needs. An in-person discussion followed.
Results: Twenty-five cardiologists (28% female, 12% Hispanic, 68% White) participated in the survey and 15 in the discussion; genetics training backgrounds varied greatly. Clinical genetic testing for DCM was conducted by all programs with annual uptake ranging from 5%-70% (median 25%). Thirteen respondents (52%) did not use selection criteria for testing whereas others selected patients based on specific clinical and family history data. Eight (32%) ordered testing by themselves, and the remainder had testing managed mostly by a genetic counselor or others with genetic expertise (16/17; 94%). Six themes were distilled from open-ended responses regarding thoughts for the future and included access to genetics services, navigating uncertainty, knowledge needs, cost concerns, family-based care barriers, and institutional infrastructure limitations. Following an in-person discussion, four areas were identified for focused effort: improved reimbursement for genetic services, genetic counselor integration with HF/TX teams, improved provider education resources, and more research to find missing heritability and to resolve uncertain results.
Conclusions: HF/TX programs have implementation challenges in the provision of DCM genetic evaluations; targeted plans to facilitate precision medicine for DCM are needed.
Genetic and Genomic Medicine