Evaluating and benchmarking the EEG signal quality of high-density, dry MXene-based electrode arrays against gelled Ag/AgCl electrodes

Brian Erickson,Ryan Rich,Sneha Shankar,Brian Kim,Nicolette Driscoll,Georgios Mentzelopoulos,Guadalupe Fernandez-Nuñez,Flavia Vitale,John D Medaglia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad141e
IF: 5.043
2023-12-12
Journal of Neural Engineering
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the signal quality of dry MXene-based electrode arrays (also termed "MXtrodes") for electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings where gelled Ag/AgCl electrodes are a standard. Approach: We placed 4x4 MXtrode arrays and gelled Ag/AgCl electrodes bilaterally on the forehead. The scalp was cleaned with alcohol and rewetted with saline before application. We recorded from both electrode types simultaneously while participants performed a vigilance task. Main results: The RMS amplitude of MXtrodes was slightly higher than that of Ag/AgCl electrodes (.24 to 1.94 uV). Most MXtrode pairs had slightly lower broadband spectral coherence (.05 to .1 dB) and Delta- and Theta-band timeseries correlation (.05 to .1 units) compared to the Ag/AgCl pair (p = .95) than equally spaced Ag/AgCl electrodes (ρ <= .77, p < .001). Dry MXtrode impedance (x̄ = 5.15 KΩ cm2) was higher and more variable than gelled Ag/AgCl electrodes (x̄ = 1.21 KΩ cm2, p < .001). Significance: Dry MXene-based electrodes record EEG at quality comparable to conventional gelled Ag/AgCl, while requiring minimal scalp preparation and no gel. MXtrodes can record independent signals at a spatial density four times higher than conventional electrodes, thus opening novel opportunities for research and clinical applications that could benefit from dry and higher density configurations.
engineering, biomedical,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?