Achieving Nepal's clean cooking ambitions: an open source and geospatial cost–benefit analysis
Camilo Ramirez,Babak Khavari,Alicia Oberholzer,Bhoj Raj Ghimire,Bhogendra Mishra,Santiago Sinclair-Lecaros,Dimitris Mentis,Anobha Gurung,Dilip Khatiwada,Francesco Fuso Nerini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00209-2
IF: 28.75
2024-10-10
The Lancet Planetary Health
Abstract:Summary Background Cooking with traditional fuels can lead to severe health issues caused by household air pollution, and can also affect gender equality and drive environmental degradation. In Nepal, despite government efforts to promote electric cooking, more than half of the population still uses traditional fuels, with electric cooking adoption remaining below 1%. Several of the barriers to and enablers of clean cooking vary geographically; however, few studies have considered spatial explicit information in planning national-scale transitions to clean cooking. In this study we provide a spatially explicit roadmap to estimate the required investments and benefits gained from the transition across Nepal. Methods This study uses geospatial modelling methods to evaluate strategies to achieve the Government of Nepal's vision for a national-scale transition to clean cooking. We integrate the open-source clean cooking geospatial assessment tool OnStove and a spatial multicriteria analysis model. With OnStove, we evaluate which cooking technologies and fuels maximise the net benefits of a clean-cooking transition across each km 2 of the region. With the multicriteria analysis, we weigh stakeholder preferences and prioritise areas of action where policy should be implemented. We used the most up-to-date geospatial data to the year 2023, such as the High Resolution Settlement Layer, Open Street Maps' road networks, the Global Human Settlement Layer, NASA/USGS forest cover maps, and Facebook's Relative Wealth Index, among others. We also relied on data from the Nepal Oil Corporation, the Nepal Electricity Agency, the Central Bureau of Statistic's 2021 national census, and the Alternative Energy Promotion Center. We evaluate four scenarios capturing advances on clean cooking policy up to the year 2022, current market inefficiencies, and the potential effects of new policies for clean-cooking transition in Nepal. Findings Our results show that transitional and clean cooking technologies provide higher net benefits than traditional options everywhere across Nepal in all scenarios. Our net-benefit analysis shows that around 9563 deaths could be averted yearly if benefits and externalities were perceived and valued correctly. Furthermore, substantial benefits could be achieved in regard to greenhouse gas emissions avoidance, time saved, and health-cost reductions. Our results also show that the current subsidy strategy from the Government of Nepal is well aligned with the benefits achieved under a cost–benefit analysis. In this context, electric cooking can bring the highest benefits to the largest part of the population. The analysis showed how high subsidies for liquefied petroleum gas in Nepal can present trade-offs with energy security and independence, and how this could be avoided by transferring part of the subsidy to cover differentiated electric cooking tariffs. Accounting for stakeholder preferences and sociodemographic and geographical differences to prioritise areas of focus can balance affordability constraints and target the most vulnerable people first, thus achieving integrated and inclusive planning. Interpretation Using spatially explicit modelling approaches to evaluate strategies for a clean cooking transition can provide more nuanced results that have not been possible before. This approach can enable data-driven and integrated planning to help to understand which locations of a study area should be prioritised for policy application. Integrated planning can help to reduce affordability constraints on the population and design strategies for a sustainable and inclusive transition. These strategies allow financial institutions, donors, impact investors, development organisations, and government agencies to use their resources, funds, and assistance to create a large impact. Funding Clean Cooking Alliance.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences