Abstract:Galaxy-scale gravitational lenses are often modeled with two-component mass profiles where one component represents the stellar mass and the second is an NFW profile representing the dark matter. Outside of the spherical case, the NFW profile is costly to implement, and so it is approximated via two different methods; ellipticity can be introduced via the lensing potential (NFWp) or via the mass by approximating the NFW profile as a sum of analytical profiles (NFWm). While the NFWp method has been the default for lensing applications, it gives a different prescription of the azimuthal structure, which we show introduces ubiquitous gradients in ellipticity and boxiness in the mass distribution rather than having a constant elliptical shape. Because unmodeled azimuthal structure has been shown to be able to bias lens model results, we explore the degree to which this introduced azimuthal structure can affect the model accuracy. We construct input profiles using composite models using both the NFWp and NFWm methods and fit these mocks with a power-law elliptical mass distribution (PEMD) model with external shear. As a measure of the accuracy of the recovered lensing potential, we calculate the value of the Hubble parameter $H_0$ one would determine from the lensing fit. We find that the fits to the NFWp input return $H_0$ values which are systematically biased by about $3\%$ lower than the NFWm counterparts. We explore whether such an effect is attributable to the mass sheet transformation (MST) by using an MST-independent quantity, $\xi_2$. We show that, as expected, the NFWm mocks are degenerate with PEMD through an MST. For the NFWp, an additional bias is found beyond the MST due to azimuthal structures {\it exterior to the Einstein radius}. We recommend modelers use an NFWm prescription in the future, such that azimuthal structure can be introduced explicitly rather than implicitly.

Parameter degeneracy in models of the quadruple lens system Q2237+0305

On the Magnification Relations in Quadruple Lenses: a Moment Approach

Multipole Gravitational Lensing and High-Order Perturbations on the Quadrupole Lens

Probing the Structure of Lensing Galaxies with Quadruple Lenses: the Effect of ‘external’ Shear

Degeneracies of parametric lens model families near folds and cusps

The anatomy of a quadruply imaged gravitational lens system

Combining Time Delays and Image Positions for Quadruple Lenses: a Moment Approach

The magnification invariant of circularly-symmetric lens models

On the Universality of Microlensing in Quadruple Gravitational Lenses

How Cumbersome is a Tenth Order Polynomial?: The Case of Gravitational Triple Lens Equation

Extrapolating the projected potential of gravitational lens models: property-preserving degeneracies

Improving flux ratio anomaly precision by measuring gravitational lens multipole moments with extended arcs

Parameter free Hubble constant from the quadruply lensed quasar SDSS J1004 + 4112

Cusp Summations and Cusp Relations of Simple Quad Lenses

Statistical Bias in the Hubble Constant and Mass Power Law Slope for Mock Strong Lenses

Comparison of Strong Gravitational Lens Model Software III. Direct and indirect semi-independent lens model comparisons of COSMOS J095930+023427, SDSS J1320+1644, SDSSJ1430+4105 and J1000+0021

GridBank: A Grid Accounting Services Architecture (GASA) for Distributed Systems Sharing and Integration

Qualitative Theory for Lensed QSOs

On the ellipticity parameterization for an NFW profile: an overlooked angular structure in strong lens modeling

Models of the Strongly Lensed Quasar DES J0408-5354

Time Delays for the Giant Quadruple Lensed Quasar SDSS J1004+4112: Prospects for Determining the Density Profile of the Lensing Cluster