You can't handle the truth! Comparing serum phosphatidylethanol to self-reported alcohol intake in chronic liver disease patients

Kyle Scholten,Patrick Twohig,Kaeli Samson,Kevin Brittan,Alexandra Fiedler,Josh Warner,Tomoki Sempokuya,Anna Willet,Thoetchai Peeraphatdit,Marco Olivera,Thoetchai(Bee) Peeraphatdit
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.01.195
IF: 5.165
2024-03-03
Digestive and Liver Disease
Abstract:Background Serum phosphatidylethanol (PEth) testing has emerged as a promising biomarker for assessing recent alcohol consumption, surpassing the limitations of self-reported data. Limited clinical data exists comparing PEth levels and patients' reported alcohol intake. Aims Compare PEth testing results with self-reported alcohol intake and assesses variables associated with underreporting. Methods Single-center retrospective cohort of patients with a diagnosis of chronic liver disease and serum PEth. A patient's first positive PEth (>/=10 ng/mL) and self-reported alcohol consumption was used. PEth results were categorized as mild (10–20), moderate (20–200), or heavy (>200). Severity measures between self-report and PEth were assessed using Bhapkar's test and Bonferroni-adjusted McNemar's tests. Demographic data was analyzed using Chi-Square tests. Results 279 patients were included. 94 (33.7%) patients had consistency with self-report, and 185 patients had inconsistencies in their report (66.3%, p < 0.001). Of 279 patients, 161 (57.7%) underreported their alcohol consumption, and 55 (19.7%) heavy PEth patients underreported alcohol consumption as light. 58% of alcohol-related and 56.4% of non-alcohol-related cirrhotic patients underreported their alcohol use. Conclusion In our cohort, only one third of self-reported alcohol consumption was consistent with the PEth level. Notably, 57.7% underreported alcohol intake. Our study reinforces the clinical importance of PEth testing as an objective clinical measure.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?