Abstract:Purpose: Science is subject to a normative structure that includes how the contributions and interactions between scientists are rewarded. Authorship and citations have been the key elements within the reward system of science, whereas acknowledgements, despite being a well-established element in scholarly communication, have not received the same attention. This paper aims to put forward the bearing of acknowledgements in the humanities to bring to the foreground contributions and interactions that, otherwise, would remain invisible through traditional indicators of research performance. Design/methodology/approach: The study provides a comprehensive framework to understanding acknowledgements as part of the reward system with a special focus on its value in the humanities as a reflection of intellectual indebtedness. The distinctive features of research in the humanities are outlined and the role of acknowledgements as a source of contributorship information is reviewed to support these assumptions. Findings: Peer interactive communication is the prevailing support thanked in the acknowledgements of humanities, so the notion of acknowledgements as super-citations can make special sense in this area. Since single-authored papers still predominate as publishing pattern in this domain, the study of acknowledgements might help to understand social interactions and intellectual influences that lie behind a piece of research and are not visible through authorship. Originality/value: Previous works have proposed and explored the prevailing acknowledgement types by domain. This paper focuses on the humanities to show the role of acknowledgements within the reward system and highlight publication patterns and inherent research features which make acknowledgements particularly interesting in the area as reflection of the socio-cognitive structure of research.

Can Standard Cosmological Models Explain the Observed Abell Cluster Bulk Flow?

Recognition in interaction: theoretical and empirical observations

A comprehensive analysis of acknowledgement texts in Web of Science: a case study on four scientific domains

Human-like informative conversations: Better acknowledgements using conditional mutual information

Normative versus strategic accounts of acknowledgment data: the case of the top-five journals of economics

Evaluation of Embedding Models for Automatic Extraction and Classification of Acknowledged Entities in Scientific Documents

Dialogue Act Modeling for Automatic Tagging and Recognition of Conversational Speech

Modeling Non-Cooperative Dialogue: Theoretical and Empirical Insights

Examining the Role of Peer Acknowledgements on Social Annotations: Unraveling the Psychological Underpinnings

Modeling Empathetic Alignment in Conversation

Beyond Land Acknowledgment in Settler Institutions

Acknowledgments in scientific publications: Presence in Spanish science and text patterns across disciplines

Embedding Models for Supervised Automatic Extraction and Classification of Named Entities in Scientific Acknowledgements

An Incremental Iterated Response Model of Pragmatics

Making visible the invisible through the analysis of acknowledgements in the humanities

Modeling Intent, Dialog Policies and Response Adaptation for Goal-Oriented Interactions

Reasoning About Pragmatics with Neural Listeners and Speakers

Talk Less, Interact Better: Evaluating In-context Conversational Adaptation in Multimodal LLMs

Investigating Reinforcement Learning for Communication Strategies in a Task-Initiative Setting

Evaluating Models of Robust Word Recognition with Serial Reproduction

Conversational Feedback in Scripted versus Spontaneous Dialogues: A Comparative Analysis