Abstract:We compute the string energy-momentum tensor and {\bf derive} the string equation of state from exact string dynamics in cosmological spacetimes. $1+1,~2+1$ and $D$-dimensional universes are treated for any expansion factor $R$. Strings obey the perfect fluid relation $ p = (\gamma -1) \rho $ with three different behaviours: (i) {\it Unstable} for $ R \to \infty $ with growing energy density $ \rho \sim R^{2-D} $, {\bf negative} pressure, and $ \gamma =(D-2)/(D-1) $; (ii){\it Dual} for $ R \to 0 $, with $ \rho \sim R^{-D} $, {\bf positive} pressure and $\gamma = D/(D-1) $ (as radiation); (iii) {\it Stable} for $ R \to \infty $ with $ \rho \sim R^{1-D} $, {\bf vanishing} pressure and $\gamma = 1 $ (as cold matter). We find the back reaction effect of these strings on the spacetime and we take into account the quantum string decay through string splitting. This is achieved by considering {\bf self-consistently} the strings as matter sources for the Einstein equations, as well as for the complete effective string equations. String splitting exponentially suppress the density of unstable strings for large $R$. The self-consistent solution to the Einstein equations for string dominated universes exhibits the realistic matter dominated behaviour $ R \sim (X^0)^{2/(D-1)}\; $ for large times and the radiation dominated behaviour $ R \sim (X^0)^{2/D}\; $ for early times. De Sitter universe does not emerge as solution of the effective string equations. The effective string action (whatever be the dilaton, its potential and the central charge term) is not the appropriate framework in which to address the question of string driven inflation.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the analysis of syntactic ambiguity in natural language processing. Specifically, the author focuses on how humans deal with the ubiquitous language ambiguity, especially syntactic ambiguity, in natural language communication. The goal of the paper is to construct a detailed theory of sentence - processing mechanisms, including their components and the nature and dynamics of their interactions, in order to explain the measurement results of the processing difficulty (or lack of difficulty) of different sentence types in the presence or absence of context. The core view in the paper is that the syntactic processor, in its simplest form, only represents the syntactic analysis of the input and is not responsible for the resolution of ambiguity - this task is accomplished by the interpreter. This view contrasts with the traditional syntactic - processor - based theories, which usually assume that the processing difficulty stems from certain characteristics of the syntactic processor, such as memory limitations or preferences for certain analyses. To support this core view, the paper is divided into three parts: 1. **Introduction**: Reviewed some proposals in the sentence - processing literature, most of which implicitly assumed a specialized syntactic processor. 2. **Data exploration**: Explored a set of data supporting the structural preference theory, which is inconsistent with the core view of this paper. The author showed how the current proposal can explain these data and predicted in which cases the structural preference theory would be wrong. 3. **Theoretical exploration**: Studied how to implement the proposed architecture using the current concept of language ability. This part included a discussion of the parsing algorithm and an introduction of the ambiguity - resolution method based on ability. Through these analyses, the paper aims to provide a new way of understanding the human language - processing mechanism, especially how to perform effective analysis in the face of syntactic ambiguity.

Back Reaction of Strings in Self-Consistent String Cosmology