Posterior fixation and fusion with atlas pedicle screw system for upper cervical diseases.

Lei Li,F. Zhou,Huan Wang,Shaoqian Cui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1008-1275(08)60066-8

2008-12-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Strategies of posterior screw fixation on C1 pedicle with the variation of posterior arch of altas

CHEN Qixin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2013.05.08

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objectives: To investigate the strategy and safety of posterior screw fixaiton on C1 pedical with variation.Methods: 28 cases from January 2005 to January 2011 suffering from upper cervical spine instability and with C1 pedicle variation treated surgically in our hospital were reviewed retrospectively.There were 11 males and 17 females,with the ages ranging from 6 to 75 years old(average,36.2 ±15.5 years).Three cross sections(surface of posterior arch,vertebral artery groove and junction of pedicle and lateral mass) and their two sides(lateral and medial side) were divided on CT reconstruction image,and the height of posterior arch was measured thereby.Three types of the atlas with variation could be defined accordingly.Depended on these types,different screw placements were performed as follows: type Ⅰ(height of C1 posterior arch less than 3.5mm and vertebral artery groove more than 3.5mm) with the screw placed under posterior arch;type Ⅱ(both of them less than 3.5mm) with the fixation at the boundary between pedicle and lateral mass;type Ⅲ(height of C1 posterior arch more than 3.5mm and vertebral artery groove less than 3.5mm) with in-out-in screw placement technique.The accuracy of screw placement and associated complications were evaluated.Results: 56 atlas pedicles were placed which included 34 type Ⅰ,18 type Ⅱ and 4 type Ⅲ.A total of 54 screws was successfully placed into the atlas(96.4%),while the other 2 screws failed and changed into laminar hook due to small pedicle diameter from type II variation.After operation,CT scan showed ideal or acceptable(96.3%) screw position in 52 and unacceptable(3.7%)in 2 with screws penetrating into spinal canal.There were no obvious complications in the present series,while two patients complained of greater occipital nerve irritation which was alleviated after appropriate treatment.Conclusions: Pedicle screw can be inserted safely in the C1 with posterior arch variation.Different screw placement strategies can be employed depending on the C1 variation types.
[Clinical Effect of Posterior Atlanto Axial Vertebra Internal Fixation for Treatment of Instability of Occipitocervical].

Qiang-Hua Zhang,Qi-Xin Chen,Fang-Cai Li,Gang Chen,Bin Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2013.06.012

2013-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore radiographic results and clinical effects of posterior atlanto axial vertebra internal fixation in treating instability of occipitocervical.METHODS:The clinical data of 155 patients with instability of occipitocervical treated by posterior atlanto axial vertebra internal fixation were respectively analyzed from September 2005 to January 2011. There were 68 males and 87 females, ranging in age from 6 to 75 years old with an average of 45.6 years old. Of them, 53 cases were fresh odontoid fractures(Aderson type II C), 30 cases were os odontoideum, 20 cases were old odontoid fractures, 18 cases were unstable atlas fractures, 12 cases were atlanto axial rotatory dislocation, 11 cases were atlanto axial dislocation after rheumatoid arthritis, and 11 cases were basilar invagination. Radiographic results were evaluated in terms of atlas pedicle screw fixation, bone healing and bone graft fusion. Clinical effect evaluation included relief of pain in the occipital-cervical region by VAS score and JOA score.RESULTS:Totally 300 screws were set through atlas pedicle screw fixation in 150 patients. Five patients receivde hook fixation. Postoperative CT showed ideal nailing were 275 (91.7%),acceptable nailing were 14 (4.7%) and unacceptable nailing were 11 (3.6%). All patients were followed up, and the duration ranged from 16 to 40 months with an average of 25.4 months. The fresh fractures healed and 140 cases got bone graft fusion. Preoperative VAS and JOA score were respectively improved from (7.2 +/- 1.1), (7.3 +/- 2.4) to (3.2 +/- 1.1), (13.3 +/- 2.4) at the latest follow-up.CONCLUSION:Posterior atlanto axial vertebra internal fixation in treating instability of occipitocervical can effectively recover physiological curvature of cervical, provide mechanical stability, and obtain good clinical effect. For the young patients who require further activity, posterior fixation and non-fusion technology is a good choose, which can avoid bone graft.
Progression of Research of Posterior Screw Fixation on Atlas

YANG Di,CHEN Qi-xin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2006.03.040

2006-01-01

Abstract:Posterior screw fixation on atlas includes posterior screw fixation within lateral mass of atlas and in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass.Atlas is anatomically capable for screw fixation in its lateral mass and via its posterior arch and lateral mass.But it is necessary to pay attention to the thickness of the posterior arch at the thinnest part of the groove and avoid injuring the vertebral artery and the internal carotid artery.Routine lateral radiographs and CT scans of the cervical spines of patients must be performed before surgery,which can be of definite help in locating the entry point and regulating the screw direction.The screws have good pullout strength(even when placed unicortically),and constructs using C_1 lateral mass screws and C_2 pars screws connected with rods are as stable as transarticular screws with posterior wire-graft constructs.At present there are three popular techniques:the Harms technique,as well as Xia and Gupta,which is screw fixation within lateral mass of atlas,and the Tan and Ma technique,which are both screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass.Clinical results showed that posterior screw fixation on atlas could relieve spinal and neural oppression immediately,improve clinical symptoms,have good immediate postoperative stability,keep the movement of occipitocervical region,and showed its advantages in very high successful fusion rate,and very few instrument failure,morbidity and complications.
Posterior Arthrodesis of C1-C3 for the Stabilization of Multiple Unstable Upper Cervical Fractures with Spinal Cord Compromise

Deting Xue,Qixin Chen,Gang Chen,Wenhai Zhuo,Fangcai Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000005841

IF: 1.6

2017-01-01

Medicine

Abstract:Background: Multiple fractures of the atlas and axis are rare. The management of multiple fragment axis fractures and unstable atlas fractures is still challenging for the spinal surgeon. There are no published reports of similar fractures with 3-part fracture of axis associated with an unstable atlas fracture.Case summary: We present a patient with concurrent axis and atlas fractures, which have not been reported. The patient suffered hyperextension injury with neck pain and numbness of the bilateral upper extremity associated with weakness after a 2-m fall. The axis fractures included an odontoid type IIA fracture and traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2-C3. The atlas fracture was unstable. The neurological examination manifested as central canal syndrome, which was due to the hyperextension injury of cervical spine and spondylolisthesis of C2-C3. The patient was diagnosed as multiple unstable upper cervical fractures with spinal cord compromise. We performed posterior arthrodesis of C1-C3. Postoperatively, the patient showed neurological improvement, and C1-C3 had fused at the 3-month follow-up.Conclusion: Posterior arthrodesis of C1-C3 could provide a stable fixation for the 3 parts of axis (an odontoid type IIA fracture and traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2-C3) combined an unstable atlas fracture. Both the patient and the doctor were satisfied with the results of the treatment. So posterior arthrodesis of C1-C3 is a suitable treatment option for the treatment of a concurrent unstable atlas fracture and multiple fractures of the axis.
Biomechanical and Clinical Study of Anterior Transarticular Screw Fixation for Treatment of Traumatic Instability of C1-C2 Joint

CHEN Zhuang-hong,HUANG Wei-bing,CAI Xian-hua,ZHANG Chun-xia,HUANG Ji-feng,LIU Xi-ming,XU Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2011.08.069

2011-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the biomechanical stability of C1-C2 after anterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation and assess its curative effect clinically. Methods Eight human cadaveric occipitocervical spine specimens which have been harvested freshly were tested in three modes of loading,flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, and four configurations including intact, after an odontoid fracture, and after anterior or posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation. All tests were performed in load and torque control. Clinically, 20 patients who had C1 -C2 traumatic instability were instructed to be operated with anterior C1 -C2 transarticular screw fixation technique, planting cancellated granulate bone into the space between muscular tubercle of arias and odontoid bone. Results Both the anterior and posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation techniques limited motion at the C1-C2 articulation at the tested directions and there were no significant differences between the two techniques. In the 20 patients, one with complete cervical cord injury died of pulmonary infection a month later, and the rest 19 were followed up about 7 months to 3 years (mean 18 months). They all had no trauma on vertebral artery and cervical cord during their cervical operations, and had aflantoaxial synostoses. Conclusion The anterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation not only is easy to manipulate and provides the same stability as posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation, but has a less risk of injury on vertebral artery and cervical cord.
Posterior Atlantoaxial Transpedicular Screw Fixation of Unstable Atlas Fractures Combined with Rupture of Transverse Ligament

Zhang Ning,Li Fangcai,Chen Qixin,Chen Weishan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2017.03.008

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To determine the outcome of unstable atlas fractures combined with rupture of transverse ligament treated by posterior atlantoaxial transpedicular screw fixation.Methods A retrospective case series study was made on 17 patients with unstable atlas fractures combined with rupture of transverse ligament treated by posterior atlantoaxial transpedicular screw fixation and fusion from January 2008 to December 2015.There were 13 males and 4 females,with age range of 34-69 years (mean,47.8 years).All atlas fractures were Jefferson fractures (Levine-Edwards type Ⅲ).Classification of transverse ligament rupture was type Ⅰ in 12 patients and type Ⅱ in 5 patients.No patients had neurologic deficit [American spinal injury association (ASIA) classification grade E].Operation time,blood loss,implant failure,bone fusion and visual analogue scale (VAS) were recorded after operation.Results Operation time was 85-120 min (mean,102 min).Blood loss was 90-150 ml (mean,115 ml).All patients were followed up for 10-20 months (mean,17.8 months).At the final follow-up,all patients achieved bone union,with no implant loosening or breakage happened.VAS was improved from preoperative (5.5 ± 1.8) points to (2.4 ± 1.5) points at tbe final follow-up (P ＜ 0.05).ASIA Grade E remained in all patients.Conclusion Posterior atlantoaxial transpedicular screw fixation of unstable atlas fractures combined with rupture of transverse ligament is a safe and effective surgical procedure that is able to restore the atlanto-axial vertebral stability and relieve pain.
Establishment of Finite Element Model of Anterior Cervical Transpedicular System for Reconstruction of Cervical Stabili-Ty after Subtotal Resection of Two Segments of Lower Cervical Spine

Jie Li,Liu-Jun Zhao,Kai-Feng Gan,Bin-Hui Chen,Yi-Lei Chen,Pei-Ming Sang,Di-Kai Bei,Teng-di Fan,Feng-Dong Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.02.017

2022-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To establish the fixation model of anterior cervical transpedicular system (ACTPS) after subtotal resection of two segments of lower cervical spine(C3-C7) in order to provide a finite element modeling method for anterior cervical reconstruction.METHODS:The CT data of the cervical segment (C1-T1) of a 30-year-old adult healthy male volunteer was collected. Used Mimics 10.0, Rapidform XOR3, HyperMesh 10.0, CATIA5V19 and ANSYS 14.0 to establish the three-dimensional nonlinear complete model of lower cervical spine(C3-C7) as the intact group. The number of units and nodes of the complete model were recorded. After the effectiveness of the complete model was verified, the C5 and C6 vertebral subtotal resection was performed, and the ACTPS model was established as the ACTPS group. The axial force of 75 N and moment couple of 1N·m was loaded on the upper surface of C3 in intact group and ACTPS group, the range of motion(ROM)and stress distribution in states of flexion extension, lateral flexion, rotation was compared between two groups.RESULTS:There were 85 832 elements and 23 612 nodes in the complete model of lower cervical spine(C3-C7) which was established in this experiment. The stress distribution of ACTPS internal fixation model was relatively uniform. Comparing with the intact group, the overall range of motion in ACTPS group was decreased in flexion extension, lateral flexion and rotation directions, and the corresponding compensation of adjacent C3,4 segment was increased slightly.CONCLUSION:The stress distribution of ACTPS fixation system is uniform, there is no stress concentration area at the joint of screw and titanium plate, and the fracture risk of internal fixation is low. It is suitable for stability reconstruction after anterior decompression of two or more cervical segments.
Treatment of Atlantoaxial Instability with C1-C2 Posterior Transarticular Screw Fixation

Jian-Wei Ruan,Shun-Wu Fan,Xiang-Qian Fang,Hai-Bao Wang,Li-ya Qiao,Tao Chen,Xiao-Ping Zhao,Jian-Hua Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2008.02.026

2008-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the technique of C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability or dislocation.METHODS:Among 14 patients with atlantoaxial instability, 10 were male and 4 patients were female, with an average age of 38.6 years ranging from 17 to 62 years. All patients were treated by internal fixation with transarticular screws.RESULTS:There were 28 screws applied in 14 patients. All patients were followed up. The average follow-up period was 16 months (range, 9 to 35 months). The postoperative JOA score was ranging from 13.8 to 15.8 with the average score of (14.50 +/- 0.66) and the improved rate of (76.12 +/- 4.94)%. No spinal injury and vertical artery injury was found and osseous fusion was completed in all patients.CONCLUSION:The technique of C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation is one of the best treatments for atlantoaxial instability. Without the help of structural bone graft and aided internal fixation, morselized cancellous bone graft can acquire effective osseous fusion.
Anterior Cervical Transpedicular Screw Fixation System in Subaxial Cervical Spine: A Finite Element Comparative Study.

Jie Li,Kaifeng Gan,Binhui Chen,Yilei Chen,Jinjiong Hong,Dikai Bei,Tengdi Fan,Minzhe Zheng,Liujun Zhao,Fengdong Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000029316

IF: 1.6

2022-01-01

Medicine

Abstract:Multilevel cervical corpectomy has raised the concern among surgeons that reconstruction with the anterior cervical screw plate system (ACSPS) alone may fail eventually. As an alternative, the anterior cervical transpedicular screw (ACTPS) has been adopted in clinical practice. We used the finite element analysis to investigate whether ACTPS is a more reasonable choice, in comparison with ACSPS, after a 2-level corpectomy in the subaxial cervical spine. These 2 types of implantation models with the applied 75 N axial pressure and 1 N • m pure moment of the couple were evaluated. Compared with the intact model, the range of motion (ROM) at the operative segments (C4–C7) decreased by 97.5% in flexion-extension, 91.3% in axial rotation, and 99.3% in lateral bending in the ACTPS model, whereas it decreased by 95.1%, 73.4%, 96.9% in the ACSPS model respectively. The ROM at the adjacent segment (C3/4) in the ACTPS model decreased in all motions, while that of the ACSPS model increased in axial rotation and flexion-extension compared with the intact model. Compared to the ACSPS model, whose stress concentrated on the interface between the screws and the titanium plate, the stress of the ACTPS model was well-distributed. There was also a significant difference between the maximum stress value of the 2 models. ACTPS and ACSPS are biomechanically favorable. The stability in reducing ROM of ACTPS may be better and the risk of failure for internal fixator is relatively low compared with ACSPS fixation except for under lateral bending in reconstruction the stability of the subaxial cervical spine after 2-level corpectomy.
[Posterior Occipitocervical Fixation Using C2 Pedicle Screws and Occipitocervical Plate Systems].

Chao Wang,Shao-Meng Yin,Ming Yan,Hai-Tao Zhou,Geng-Ting Dang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:0529-5815.2004.12.002

2004-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To observe the clinical effect of a occipitocervical fixation systems using C(2) pedicle screws and plates.METHODS:An occipitocervical fixation system was designed. Since June 2001 to March 2003, 38 patients with instability of atlantoaxial joint underwent reconstructive surgery using this systems. Twenty-four patients were associated with congenital occipitalization. The pedicle screws were inserted into C(2) pedicles in the direction as its axis. The occipitocervical plate was slightly bent to fit the occipital contour and fixed onto the occiput. Hyperflexion alignment of the occipitoatlantoaxial complex was corrected by application of extensional force created by tightening of the nut on the pedicle screws. The autogenous cancellous bones were grafted between the occiput and the axis.RESULTS:In this series, neither vertebral artery nor spinal cord was injured. 36 of 38 cases were followed up for an average of 18 months, all cases achieved solid bony fusion. No implant failure was found.CONCLUSIONS:Occipitocervical reconstruction by the combination of C(2) pedicle screws and occipitocervical plate systems can provide sufficient correction of malalignment in the occipitoatlantoaxial region and achieve high fusion rate.
Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation for Complex Atlantoaxial Fractures with Atlanto-Dental Interval of ≥5 Mm or C2-C3 Angulation of ≥11°

Lei Wang,Chao Liu,Qinghua Zhao,Jiwei Tian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0104-5

IF: 2.6

2014-01-01

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Abstract:Previous studies have demonstrated that the posterior pedicle screw fixation is an effective and safe method to treat atlantoaxial fractures. However, no report focuses on only the complex atlantoaxial fractures with atlanto-dental interval (ADI) of ≥5 mm or C2-C3 angulation of ≥11°.
Biomechanical stability of atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations with unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw: a finite element analysis

刘观燚,沈锋,马维虎,周雷杰,潘志军,李庆

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20190415-00139

2020-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To determine the biomechanical stability of atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations with unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw.Methods:After nonlinear finite element models of the intact upper cervical spine (C0-3) were constructed and validated, they were processed into 3 kinds with normal axis anatomy, a high-riding vertebral artery and a thin axis lamina, re-spectively.In the models, the odontoid fracture stabilized by atlantoaxial fixation and the atlas fracture sta-bilized by occipitocervical fixation were simulated.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the group of unilateral spinous process screw+contralateral pedicle screw+bilateral atlas lateral mass screws (spinous process screw group) was compared with that of bilateral axis pedicle screws+bilateral atlas lateral mass screws (pedicle screw group); in the occipitocervical fixation, the group of unilateral spinous process screw+contralateral pedicle screw+occipital screws (spinous process screw group) was compared with that of bilateral axis pedicle screws+occipital screws (pedicle screw group).Three different techniques in insertion of spinous process screws (horizontal, oblique and vertical) were applied.The range of motion (ROM) was measured in extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of occipitocervical bodies (C0-C3) after internal fixation.Results:Compared with the intact models, the ROMs of extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of C1-C2 were obviously reduced in the spinous process screw group and the pedicle screw group in the models with atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the ROMs of extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of C1-C2 were greater in the spinous process screw group than in the pedicle screw group; in the occipitocervical fixation, the spinous process screw group had greater ROM of lateral flexion of C1-C2 and greater ROM of rotation of C0-C2 than the pedicle screw group.There were unobvious differences in insertion of spinous process screws between the horizontal, oblique and vertical techniques.Conclusions:In the atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations, the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw can provide as fine stability as the bilateral axis pedicle screws.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the bilateral axis pedicle screws may lead to better stability of C1-C2 than the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw.In the occipitocervical fixation, the bilateral axis pedicle screws may lead to better stability of C1-C2 in lateral flexion and rotation than the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw. The 3 different techniques in insertion of spinous process screws lead to an unobvious difference in the stability of C1-C2.
The Design and Preliminary Clinical Application of Anterior Cervical Low-Profile Plate System

俞杭平,范顺武,唐天驷,姜为民,丁亮华

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:0253-2352.2004.12.002

2004-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical results of self-designed anterior cervical low-profile plate system (ACLPS). Methods The anterior cervical plate system, composed of one plate, two locking caps and two types of screws. The system was made of medical titanium alloy possessing the following characteristics: low profile, instant locking, versatile use and unicortical screw fixation. 37 patients with cervical disorders were fixed with ACLPS after anterior spinal decompression and interbody fusion. The diagnosis included spondylosis in 8 cases, cervical intervertebral disk protrusion in 12, fracture and /or dislocation with paralysis in 14 and metastatic tumor in 3. The fusion were performed with autologous iliac crest bone graft for 29 patients while the others with cages. The fixed levels ranged from C3 to T1. Results 37 cases were followed-up for an average of 9.6 months, ranging from 6 to 12 months. Postoperatively all patients felt comfortable in neck without any foreign body sensation. No obvious complications such as wound infection, hematoma, asphyxia, nerve injury, laceration of spinal cord dura, leakage of cerebrospinal fluid, bleeding and nonhealing of the wound were observed. Solid interbody fusion were achieved in all cases. According to JOA scores, the total effective rate was 94.6% while the good rate was 83.8%. The radiograph confirmed that there was no dislocation or subsidence of graft, no obvious loss of intervertebral height, no loosening or failure of implant. Conclusion In regard to the high rigidity, good bony purchasing and easy handling, ACLPS is able to provide sufficient biomechanical stability and is an optional choice for clinical use.
Cable-Strengthened C2 Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Congenital C2-3 Fusion, Atlas Occipitalization, and Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Shenglin Wang,Chao Wang,Huijie Leng,Weidong Zhao,Ming Yan,Haitao Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0b013e31826cdd3b

IF: 5.315

2012-01-01

Neurosurgery

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Atlas occipitalization and congenital C2-3 fusion often result in atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) and superior odontoid migration that requires occipitocervical fixation. The widely used technique is posterior occiput-C2 fixation with pedicle screws. However, congenital C2-3 fusion cases tend to have thinner C2 pedicles that are inadequate for normal-sized pedicle screw fixation. With the presence of AAD, the strength of the fixation is further compromised as the C2 pedicle screws (C2PS) sustain considerable cephalic shearing force during the reduction procedure. Therefore, a novel technique has been developed to augment the C2 pedicle screw fixation with a strengthening cable.OBJECTIVE: To introduce and assess this new technique.METHODS: Seventy-six patients who underwent this procedure were reviewed. The position of the instrument and resultant fusion were examined retrospectively. In the biomechanical test, 6 fresh specimens were subjected to 2 types of fixation in the order of Oc-C2 screw-plate fixation followed by additional use of strengthening cable. Under 3 loading modes (extension-flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation), the relative movement between the occiput and C2 was measured and compared in the form of range of motion.RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 26 months. Solid fusion was achieved in 75 patients (98.7%) as assessed radiologically. The only patient who experienced hardware failure eventually obtained solid fusion between the occiput and C2 after revision. Biomechanically, there was significant difference between the occiput and C2 fixation and cable-strengthened fixation in range of motion for all modes.CONCLUSION: This technique is a promising option for the treatment of AAD with congenital C2-3 fusion and occipitalization. Biomechanically, this technique can reduce the occipital-axial motion significantly compared with occiput-C2 fixation.
Selection of Treatment Strategy for Upper Cervical Injury

Chen Qixin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2019.11.001

2019-01-01

Abstract:Upper cervical spine injury is a common spine injury in the clinic,which mainly refers to the fracture,ligament tear,and dislocation of atlantoaxial and its accessory structures due to violence.The injury of upper cervical ligament complex is the main cause of instability after injury.The controversy lies in how to evaluate the effect of ligaments on stability.The injuries of different sports units may involve different ligament composite structures which show different instability characteristics and types,requiring special attention.In addition to the shape and location of the fracture,fixation method and range of the surgical treatment should be selected mainly based on whether there are stable or unstable types.The author mainly expounds the characteristics of upper cervical injury,clinical classification,diagnosis and treatment measures to discusses the difficulties and focus of the treatment of upper cervical injury,so as to provide reference for clinical treatment.
Management of Combination Fractures of the Atlas and Axis: a Report of Four Cases and Literature Review.

Chao Liu,Linghao Kuang,Lei Wang,Jiwei Tian

2014-01-01

Abstract:Four cases of combination fractures of the atlas and axis are presented. Three types of management were performed: plaster immobilization, odontoid screw fixation combined with atlantoaxial pedicle screw fixation, occipito-cervical fusion with anterior operation by staged. Based on a literature review and our experience, treatment strategies is discussed according to the stability of the upper cervical spine and neurological involvement, with a reminder that combined injuries in the upper cervical spine should be sought in any patient with a cervical injury and early surgical solution may bring benefits once injury attack.
Surgical Treatment of Complicated Atlas Fracture Combined with Adjacent Segment Instability

WANG Lei,LIU Cheng-yi,TIAN Ji-wei,ZHAO Qing-hua,DONG Shuang-hai,XIA Tian,YUAN Wen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2010.06.014

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To study the clinical and radiographic characteristics of complicated axis fractures combined with adjacent segment instability and explore reasonable surgical treatment strategy. Methods A retrospective study was performed on 21 patients with axis fractures treated from August 2003 to June 2009. There were 14 males and 7 females at mean age of 34 years. The treatment strategy was based on the fracture type and the stabilities of adjacent atlantoaxial joint and intervertebral C2/3.Treatment strategies included anterior C2/3 interbody discectomy and fusion, anterior cervical plate internal fixation, odontoid screw fixation, posterior C1-2 pedicle screw fixation, cervical lateral mass screw fixation or combined anteroposterior approach. Results All patients were immobilized in a hard collar for thee months and followed up for 6-36 months (average 12 months), which showed bony fusion and cervical stability, with no intraoperative surgery-related complications such as loosening, extrusion or breakage of fixation, vertebral artery injury, nerve damage, cerebrospinal fluid leakage or wound infection. Neurological recovery was observed in five patients. Conclusions For complicated atlas fractures, correct identification of fracture type and instability disturbance of adjacent atlantoaxial joint and C2/3 as well as active treatment can conduce to better effect.
Post atlantoaxial fusion for unilateral cleft of atlas posterior arch associated with os odontoideum: case report and technique note

Jian Yang,Bin Ni,Wangjun Yan,Fengjin Zhou,Jinshui Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1693-x

2011-01-01

Abstract:A case of a 34-year-old female with unilateral cleft of atlas posterior arch associated with os odontoideum is reported. The patient had experienced neck pain for 6 months. Five days earlier to admission the pain aggravated as a result of mild head trauma from behind. Imaging examinations revealed C1–2 subluxation as well as the deformity. After 3 days of skull traction, a sound C1–2 reduction was achieved. Post atlantoaxial fusion using bilateral transarticular screws combined with C1 laminar hook on the intact side and autogenous bone graft was performed. On the sixth month of postoperative follow-up, CT revealed solid fusion was achieved. No related complications were detected within 3 years of follow-up. The clinical manifestations and imaging findings were presented. The incidence and etiopathogenesis of hypoplastic posterior arch of the atlas were concisely introduced. Techniques of post atlantoaxial fusion under circumstances of unilateral C1 posterior elements defects were discussed. The authors believe bilateral transarticular screws combined with C1 laminar hook on the intact side and autogenous bone graft can be applicable to atlantoaxial fusion on the premise of preoperative C1–2 reduction and C1 posterior arch remaining >1/2 of its full length.
The biomechanical study of craniovertebral junction fixation with posterior transarticular screw]

Wang-jun Yan,Bin Cai,Yu Chen,Wen Yuan,Jia-shun Li,Lian-shun Jia,Guo-biao Yang,Wei-ming Zeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:0376-2491.2006.13.003

2006-01-01

Abstract:To evaluate the stability of biomechanics of occipitoatlantoaxial reconstruction with transarticular screw fixation.Twelve fresh human cadaveric occipitocervical spine specimens were mounted in a custom-designed, spine-testing machine that applied pure moments while recording the three-dimensional angular movement at occiput (Oc)-C(1) and C(1 - 2) segments. The specimens were tested under seven different conditions: the intact (intact group), the occipitoatlantoaxial instability (Destabilized group), fixation with Ti-cable plus bone graft group (cable + graf group), fixation with the transarticular fixation (CTS group), fixation with SUMMIT occitocervical spinal fixation system (SUMMIT group), fixation with transarticular screw plus bone graft (CTS + graf group), and fixation with SMMIT system and plus graft group (SUMMIT + graf group). The data obtained were statistically analyzed.The CTS group reduced motion to well within the normal rang. In the Oc-C(1) segment, The CTS group and SUMMIT group allowed a very small rang of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) during lateral bending and axial rotation. The ROM and NZ during flexion and extension of the SUMMIT group, were significantly smaller than those of cable + graf group and CTS group (6.64 degrees +/- 0.59 degrees, 2.49 degrees +/- 0.26 degrees, 0.50 degrees +/- 0.03 degrees, 0.21 degrees +/- 0.01 degrees, 0.27 degrees +/- 0.07 degrees, 0.13 degrees +/- 0.01 degrees vs 10.01 degrees +/- 1.26 degrees, 3.80 degrees +/- 0.79 degrees, 7.93 degrees +/- 1.34 degrees, 3.18 degrees +/- 0.95 degrees, 9.54 degrees +/- 0.87 degrees, 5.93 degrees +/- 0.74 degrees, P < 0.05). In the C(1 - 2) segment, ROM and NZ in all directions of CTS group were smaller in rotation than SUMMIT group (1.64 degrees +/- 0.39 degrees, 0.61 degrees +/- 0.15 degrees, 0.14 degrees +/- 0.05 degrees, 0.02 degrees +/- 0.01 degrees, 0.32 degrees +/- 0.04 degrees, 0.08 degrees +/- 0.01 degrees, vs 0.21 degrees +/- 0.04 degrees, 0.07 degrees +/- 0.03 degrees, 0.21 degrees +/- 0.12 degrees, 0.10 degrees +/- 0.02 degrees, 2.92 degrees +/- 0.28 degrees, 1.27 degrees +/- 0.11 degrees, all P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in ROM and NZ in all directions between CTS + graf group and SUMMIT + Graf group (P > 0.05).In vivo biomechanics studies show that posterior occipitocervical transarticular fixation has unique features in reconstructing dynamic stability of the occipitoatlantoaxis, especially in controlling stability of rotation and lateral flexion, thus ensuring successful fusion of the implanted bone and allowing for clinical use of the technique.
Biomechanical characteristics of posterior fixation for repairing atlantoaxial instability

Shi-jun Wang,Yu-ting Li,Chun-de Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.48.019

2015-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND:With the development of atlantoaxial morphology, applied anatomy and biomechanics, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of atlantoaxial instability have attracted more and more attention. However, the development of effective fixation for atlantoaxial instability is relatively late, so scholars al over the world have made numerous studies. OBJECTIVE:To compare biomechanical functions of different fixations through atlantoaxial posterior approach, and to assess its stability. METHODS:We retrieved recent studies on comparative biomechanical evaluation and its primary clinical application of different posterior approaches in repair of atlantoaxial instability, and conducted a retrospective analysis by measuring the three-dimensional range of movement in normal atlantoaxial complex and atlantoaxial instability models. This analysis evaluated the stability of different fixations under normal three-dimensional atlantoaxial movement, and provided a biomechanical basis for reasonable fixator selection. <br> RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Atlantoaxial posterior fixation included Gal ie wire fixation, Brooks fixation, Apofix and Halifax vertebral plate hook fixation, screw fixation through joint and atlantoaxial pedicle nail/rod fixation. Gal ie technique contributes to the reduction of anterior semiluxation, but its mechanical stability is poor. Brooks technique has strong rotation and stretch forces. Apofix and Halifix vertebral plate hook device provides strong anti-rotation and anti-antelocation strength, and is more stable than Gal ie technique in mechanics. The biomechanics of screw fixation through joint was better than wire technique and Halifax. The screw fixation avoids occipitocervical fusion, and has a high requirement to instal ation. When an internal fixator was selected, immediate cervical vertebra stability should be provided to protect spinal cord functions. Upper neck functions should be maintained to reach reduction and maintenance of occipital bone, atlas and axis. A suitable fixation method should be selected for each patient.

Posterior fixation and fusion with atlas pedicle screw system for upper cervical diseases.

Strategies of posterior screw fixation on C1 pedicle with the variation of posterior arch of altas

[Clinical Effect of Posterior Atlanto Axial Vertebra Internal Fixation for Treatment of Instability of Occipitocervical].

Progression of Research of Posterior Screw Fixation on Atlas

Posterior Arthrodesis of C1-C3 for the Stabilization of Multiple Unstable Upper Cervical Fractures with Spinal Cord Compromise

Biomechanical and Clinical Study of Anterior Transarticular Screw Fixation for Treatment of Traumatic Instability of C1-C2 Joint

Posterior Atlantoaxial Transpedicular Screw Fixation of Unstable Atlas Fractures Combined with Rupture of Transverse Ligament

Establishment of Finite Element Model of Anterior Cervical Transpedicular System for Reconstruction of Cervical Stabili-Ty after Subtotal Resection of Two Segments of Lower Cervical Spine

Treatment of Atlantoaxial Instability with C1-C2 Posterior Transarticular Screw Fixation

Anterior Cervical Transpedicular Screw Fixation System in Subaxial Cervical Spine: A Finite Element Comparative Study.

[Posterior Occipitocervical Fixation Using C2 Pedicle Screws and Occipitocervical Plate Systems].

Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation for Complex Atlantoaxial Fractures with Atlanto-Dental Interval of ≥5 Mm or C2-C3 Angulation of ≥11°

Biomechanical stability of atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations with unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw: a finite element analysis

The Design and Preliminary Clinical Application of Anterior Cervical Low-Profile Plate System

Cable-Strengthened C2 Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Congenital C2-3 Fusion, Atlas Occipitalization, and Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Selection of Treatment Strategy for Upper Cervical Injury

Management of Combination Fractures of the Atlas and Axis: a Report of Four Cases and Literature Review.

Surgical Treatment of Complicated Atlas Fracture Combined with Adjacent Segment Instability

Post atlantoaxial fusion for unilateral cleft of atlas posterior arch associated with os odontoideum: case report and technique note

The biomechanical study of craniovertebral junction fixation with posterior transarticular screw]

Biomechanical characteristics of posterior fixation for repairing atlantoaxial instability