Abstract:water level (GWL) fluctuations simulation can be divided into three general categories: Analytical solution, conceptual or physical-based models, and data-based or data-driven models. The goal of this research is to develop the MODFLOW conceptual model and the GMDH data-driven model as single models ( SMs ) for GWL modeling, and then to combine these models to develop a novel mathematical-machine learning model based on a weighted multi-model ensemble mean approach (MMWEM) for a more accurate GWL simulation. For this purpose, the Miqan aquifer, located in northeastern Iran, was selected as a case study. Hydrological and hydrogeological data of the Miqan wetland for ten years (September 2013 to August 2023) with a monthly time step were used to compile models. First, the MODFLOW model was developed for one month (steady-state), then calibrated for nine years (unsteady-state), and finally tested for one year. In the second step, the GMDH model was developed. The grasshopper optimization algorithm (GOA) and the singular value decomposition (SVD) algorithms were used to determine the Ivakhnenko polynomial coefficients of the GMDH (SVD-GMDH and GOA-GMDH). 80% of the data was used to develop SVD-GMDH and GOA-GMDH, and other data was used to test models. Consequently, the sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) method was used to select the best input variables for the SVD-GMDH and GOA-GMDH. The coefficient of determination ( R2 ), root mean squared error (RMSE), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient (NSE) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Based on the results of this study, using each of the SMs , GWL can be simulated with acceptable accuracy. However, a closer examination of the results of SMs showed that the MODFLOW has the worst performance among SMs , while the GOA-GMDH has the best function for simulating GWL. In the third step, SMs was used to develop the MMWEM. The GWL of 13 of the 34 piezometers studied in this study was better simulated with the MODFLOW and GOA-GMDH than the SVD-GMDH. Therefore, these models were used to develop the MMWEM for these piezometers. For GWL simulation in 21 piezometers, the SVD-GMDH and GOA-GMDH perform better than the MODFLOW, so these models were used to develop the MMWEM in these piezometers. Finally, the results of the SMs Moreover, the MMWEM were compared with each other. Based on the results of this study, the MMWEM performs better than SMs . In many studies, only the performance of each numerical model and machine learning to simulate groundwater level (GWL) fluctuations is evaluated. Then, their results are compared with each other. However, according to this study, the combination of the results of these models is a big step in improving the accuracy of the groundwater level simulation process. In addition to simulating the groundwater level, this method can simulate other quantitative and qualitative parameters of water resources.

A novel committee-based framework for modeling groundwater level fluctuations: A combination of mathematical and machine learning models using the weighted multi-model ensemble mean algorithm

Groundwater level response identification by hybrid wavelet–machine learning conjunction models using meteorological data

Modelling qualitative and quantitative parameters of groundwater using a new wavelet conjunction heuristic method: wavelet extreme learning machine versus wavelet neural networks

Simulation of groundwater level using MODFLOW, extreme learning machine and Wavelet-Extreme Learning Machine models

Groundwater Level Modeling Using Multiobjective Optimization with Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Methods

Hybrid machine learning models for groundwater level prediction in a snow‐dominated region: An evaluation of EEMD, VMD and EWT decomposition techniques

Understanding Each Other's Models: an Introduction and a Standard Representation of 16 Global Water Models to Support Intercomparison, Improvement, and Communication

Groundwater level estimation using improved deep learning and soft computing methods

A three-dimensional numerical model for variably saturated groundwater flow using meshless weak-strong form method

A wavelet-assisted deep learning approach for simulating groundwater levels affected by low-frequency variability

Coupling a large-scale hydrological model (CWatM v1.1) with a high-resolution groundwater flow model (MODFLOW 6) to assess the impact of irrigation at regional scale

Insight to groundwater level prediction with feature effectiveness: comparison of machine learning and numerical methods

Prediction of groundwater level fluctuations using artificial intelligence-based models and GMS

Groundwater Modeling Under Variable Operating Conditions Using SWAT, MODFLOW and MT3DMS: a Catchment Scale Approach to Water Resources Management

Past, Present and Perspective Methodology for Groundwater Modeling-Based Machine Learning Approaches

Modeling and Uncertainty Analysis of Groundwater Level Using Six Evolutionary Optimization Algorithms Hybridized with ANFIS, SVM, and ANN

Forecasting of Groundwater Level Using Ensemble Hybrid Wavelet–Self-adaptive Extreme Learning Machine-Based Models

Groundwater quality modeling and determining critical points: a comparison of machine learning to Best-Worst Method

Predictive groundwater levels modelling by Inclusive Multiple Modelling (IMM) at multiple levels

Deep Learning-Based Predictive Framework for Groundwater Level Forecast in Arid Irrigated Areas

Comparison of machine learning models for predicting groundwater level, case study: Najafabad region