Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health surveys

Josep Maria Haro, Saena Arbabzadeh‐Bouchez, Traolach S Brugha, Giovanni De Girolamo, Margaret E Guyer, Robert Jin, Jean Pierre Lepine, Fausto Mazzi, Blanca Reneses, Gemma Vilagut, Nancy A Sampson, Ronald C Kessler
2006-12-01
Abstract:The DSM‐IV diagnoses generated by the fully structured lay‐administered Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) in the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys were compared to diagnoses based on follow‐up interviews with the clinician‐administered non‐patient edition of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV (SCID) in probability subsamples of the WMH surveys in France, Italy, Spain, and the US. CIDI cases were oversampled. The clinical reappraisal samples were weighted to adjust for this oversampling. Separate samples were assessed for lifetime and 12‐month prevalence. Moderate to good individual‐level CIDI‐SCID concordance was found for lifetime prevalence estimates of most disorders. The area under the ROC curve (AUC, a measure of classification accuracy that is not influenced by disorder prevalence) was 0.76 for the dichotomous classification of having …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?