Understanding the informal aspects of medication processes to maintain patient safety in hospitals: a sociotechnical ethnographic study in paediatric units

Adam B. Sutherland,Denham L. Phipps,Suzanne Grant,Joanne Hughes,Stephen Tomlin,Darren M. Ashcroft
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2333396
IF: 2.5612
2024-04-03
Ergonomics
Abstract:Adverse drug events (ADEs) are common in hospitals, affecting one in six child in-patients. Medication processes are complex systems. This study aimed to explore the work-as-done of medication safety in three English paediatric units using direct observation and semi-structured interviews. We found that a combination of the physical environment, traditional work systems and team norms were among the systemic barriers to medicines safety. The layout of wards discouraged teamworking and reinforced professional boundaries. Workspaces were inadequate, and interruptions were uncontrollable. A less experienced workforce undertook prescribing and verification while more experienced nurses undertook administration. Guidelines were inadequate, with actors muddling through together. Formal controls against ADEs included checking (of prescriptions and administration) and barcode administration systems, but these did not integrate into workflows. Families played an important part in the safe administration of medication and provision of information about their children but were isolated from other parts of the system. Formal medicines safety processes in paediatric units are disjointed and disconnected. This has led actors in the system (e.g. nursing and medical staff) to develop informal adaptations to increase resilience. There is a need to incorporate these adaptations into a systems-focussed consideration of safety processes, in order to properly inform the development of medication safety interventions.
engineering, industrial,ergonomics,psychology, applied
What problem does this paper attempt to address?