Abstract:It is generally agreed that the practice of medicine is a good idea: but is it based on the wrong science? Imagine for a minute a patient with chronic pain. An orthodox scientific approach would arrange blood tests and scans, nerve studies and X–rays, scopes and biopsies. We would prescribe evidence-based therapies devised in objective studies such as double-blind trials. We might reassure the patient that we 'can find nothing wrong' if these were negative. However, this account alone is insufficient and now rightly attracts criticism.1 Or we could take a detailed history of pain. What does it feel like? Enquire what was happening emotionally at the time it all started? We could enlist the help of psychologists and counsellors, and acknowledge that only the patient can truly describe their own distress or perceive the nature of their disorder. This account too, in isolation, is dangerous and limited:2 'The clinician is expected to approach the patient in a way that is not only scientifically valid and evidence based, but also sensitive to the full range of human capacities, including individual experience, needs and values. These two aspects are typically expected to coexist or merge in the concept of knowledge-based practice , but exactly how such a merger should come about is far from obvious.' 3 As GPs, we know that these two accounts are both meaningful and necessary; however, each is incomplete without the other account. Recent debates have highlighted that simplified versions of science can seriously undermine our work. Medicine that overemphasises patients' perceptions can do likewise.2 This illuminates the potential damaging effects that the lack of an explicit philosophical framework may be having on medical science.4 As Stempsey argues, '... a philosophical stance is required even to define a problem as a medical problem' ...

What a mess: can we tidy up the concept of health?

Reply to commentaries on Health Problems

Books: Thinking About Medicine: An Introduction to The Philosophy of Healthcare

Putting phenomenology in its place: some limits of a phenomenology of medicine

Towards Healthy Theorising About Health Behaviours In The Maze Of Messy Reality: A Reaction To Peters, De Bruin, And Crutzen

Reconciling Reductionistic and Holistic Theories of Health with Weak Emergence

Conceptual scaffolding for the philosophy of medicine

The Biopsychosocial Model of Health and Disease

The New Old (and Old New) Medical Model: Four Decades Navigating the Biomedical and Psychosocial Understandings of Health and Illness

Is there health in wellness?

Right idea, wrong science? Should Critical Realism be the new science of medical practice?

Rapid Review on the Concept of Positive Health and Its Implementation in Practice

Narrative Philosophy and Deep Reflection on Health

Books: Thinking About Patients

Rethinking the doctor-patient relationship: toward a hermeneutically-informed epistemology of medical practice

Philosophical Rhetoric of the Health: Inter-textuality,Philosophical Category and Interbody-subjectivity

The concept of health and the difference between prevention and promotion

Disease: An ill‐founded concept at odds with the principle of patient‐centred medicine

Chaos, Fractals, and Our Concept of Disease

Conversation Analysis of Communication in Medical Care: Description and Beyond