Abstract:Background: Central precocious puberty (CPP) is a common endocrine disorder in children, and its diagnosis primarily relies on the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test, which is expensive and time-consuming. With the widespread application of artificial intelligence in medicine, some studies have utilized clinical, hormonal (laboratory) and imaging data-based machine learning (ML) models to identify CPP. However, the results of these studies varied widely and were challenging to directly compare, mainly due to diverse ML methods. Therefore, the diagnostic value of clinical, hormonal (laboratory) and imaging data-based ML models for CPP remains elusive. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of ML models based on clinical, hormonal (laboratory) and imaging data for CPP through a meta-analysis of existing studies. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search for relevant English articles on clinical, hormonal (laboratory) and imaging data-based ML models for diagnosing CPP, covering the period from the database creation date to December 2023. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to assess the diagnostic value of clinical, hormonal (laboratory) and imaging data-based ML models for diagnosing CPP. The I 2 test was employed to evaluate heterogeneity, and the source of heterogeneity was investigated through meta-regression analysis. Publication bias was assessed using the Deeks funnel plot asymmetry test. Results: Six studies met the eligibility criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.93) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.90), respectively. The LR+ was 6.00, and the LR- was 0.21, indicating that clinical, hormonal (laboratory) and imaging data-based ML models exhibited an excellent ability to confirm or exclude CPP. Additionally, the SROC curve showed that the AUC of the clinical, hormonal (laboratory) and imaging data-based ML models in the diagnosis of CPP was 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.92), demonstrating good diagnostic value for CPP. Conclusion: Based on the outcomes of our meta-analysis, clinical and imaging data-based ML models are excellent diagnostic tools with high sensitivity, specificity, and AUC in the diagnosis of CPP. Despite the geographical limitations of the study findings, future research endeavors will strive to address these issues to enhance their applicability and reliability, providing more precise guidance for the differentiation and treatment of CPP.

Diagnostic model based on multiple factors for girls with central precocious puberty

Development and Validation of Clinical Diagnostic Model for Girls with Central Precocious Puberty: Machine-learning Approaches

Development and application of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of central precocious puberty in obese girls

The Use of Morning Urinary Gonadotropins and Sex Hormones in the Management of Early Puberty in Chinese Girls

Clinical analysis of 24 adolescents with precocious puberty associated with tumors

Body Mass Index and Body Fat Composition Are Both Related to Central Precocious Puberty in Chinese Girls

A Multi-Center Clinical Study of Early Predictors and Follow-Up Parameters for Girls with Rapidly Progressive Central Precocious Puberty

Combined diagnostic value of insulin-like growth factor-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3, and baseline luteinizing hormone levels for central precocious puberty in girls

Impact of Bmi on Gonadorelin-Stimulated Lh Peak in Premenarcheal Girls with Idiopathic Central Precocious Puberty

Study of glucose and lipid metabolism in girls with precocious puberty and the relationship with adiponectin

Change of Serum Sex-Hormone-Binding Globulin Levels in Girls with Central Precocious Puberty

Analysis of the cut point of peak level of luteinizing hormone in gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist test in obese girls with precocious puberty

[Application of Urinary Luteinizing Hormone in the Prediction of Central Precocious Puberty in Girls].

Basal gonadotropin levels combine with pelvic ultrasound and pituitary volume: a machine learning diagnostic model of idiopathic central precocious puberty

[Value of single-phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulation test in diagnosis of central precocious puberty in girls with different levels of body mass index]

Meta-analysis of machine learning models for the diagnosis of central precocious puberty based on clinical, hormonal (laboratory) and imaging data

Auxological and Metabolic Parameters of Children Undergoing the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Stimulation Test: Correlations with the Final Diagnosis of Central Precocious Puberty in a Single-Center Study

Development and Validation of a Combined MRI Radiomics, Imaging and Clinical Parameter‐Based Machine Learning Model for Identifying Idiopathic Central Precocious Puberty in Girls

The utilization of basal luteinizing hormone in combination with the basal luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone ratio as a diagnostic tool for central precocious puberty in girls

Rapid progressive central precocious puberty: diagnostic and predictive value of basal sex hormone levels and pelvic ultrasound

Gene Polymorphisms Associated with Central Precocious Puberty and Hormone Levels in Chinese Girls