Abstract:Background: Recent research shows that placebo mechanisms can be utilized in ethical and legal ways such as in open-label conditions, when patients know that they receive placebos, and through psychological interventions aiming to optimize patients' expectations. Showing that placebo interventions are also cost-efficient could improve their acceptability.Objective: To review studies that performed health economic evaluations (HEEs) of intentional placebo interventions and to review studies that intentionally applied placebo interventions and reported outcomes eligible for HEEs.Methods: Two systematic reviews of the literature were performed. For the first review, we searched MEDLINE using "placebo" and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms associated with HEEs such as "costs," "cost–benefit analyses," and "economics." Studies were eligible if they employed patients, applied placebo interventions, included an appropriate control group, and reported results of cost analyses. For the second review, we searched the Journal of Interdisciplinary Placebo Studies (JIPS) database and MEDLINE using search terms for outcomes eligible for cost–utility analyses, such as "quality of life" or "quality-adjusted life years" ("QALYs"). Risk of bias of all studies found was assessed according to the Cochrane Handbook, and a narrative synthesis of the results is provided.Results: The first search resulted in 1,853 articles, which were screened for eligibility. Two studies were found only in which costs or cost-effectiveness analysis were reported, but with medium to high risks of biases. The second search yielded 164 articles particularly from the JIPS database of which 11 studies met our search criteria: in six studies, patients received placebo pills in open-label conditions; three studies investigated effects of patient–physician relationships; and two studies used psychological interventions to optimize treatment expectations, in patients with various diseases and disorders. These studies report outcomes potentially eligible for HEEs when costs of interventions were known. Risks of biases were low to medium, but patients were not blinded to the conditions in most studies.Conclusions: The state of knowledge about HEEs of placebo interventions is scarce. To gain more visibility and acceptability for placebo interventions, future studies should measure outcomes usable for HEEs and costs of interventions, and HEEs should be performed for existing studies if data are available.

The Social Epistemology of Clinical Placebos

[Placebo effect: a contribution of social psychology]

["Placebo effect", from personal convictions to collective representations: A psychosocial reading of a pharmacodynamic phenomenon]

The Ethics of Placebo

Placebo Effects: Historical and Modern Evaluation

Placebo Tests for Causal Inference

The neurobiological underpinnings of placebo and nocebo effects

The place of the social in psychiatry: from structural determinants to the ecology of mind

A Fictionalist Account of Open-Label Placebo

Social Learning of Placebo Effects in Pain: A Critical Review of the Literature and a Proposed Revised Model

Placebo studies and ritual theory: a comparative analysis of Navajo, acupuncture and biomedical healing

Placebo Economics: A Systematic Review About the Economic Potential of Utilizing the Placebo Effect

The Placebo Effect in Exercise and Mental Health Research

The placebo response. Recent research and implications for family medicine

The powerful placebo effect: fact or fiction?

Nocebo: the power of suggestibility

Frontal-Brainstem Pathways Mediating Placebo Effects on Social Rejection

Placebos and painkillers: is mind as real as matter?

Placebo stimulates neuroplasticity in depression: implications for clinical practice and research

Causal progress with imperfect placebo treatments and outcomes

What does the public think of placebo use? The Canadian experience