Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol and Other Drug Use Disorders: Is a One-Size-Fits-All Approach Appropriate?
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S362864
2023-02-19
Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation
Abstract:Molly Magill, 1 Brian D Kiluk, 2 Lara A Ray 3 1 Brown University Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; 2 Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; 3 Department of Psychology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA Correspondence: Molly Magill, Brown University Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Box-G-S121-5, Providence, RI, 02913, USA, Email Purpose: We provide an overview of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) efficacy for adult alcohol or other drug use disorders (AOD) and consider some key variations in application as well as contextual (ie, moderators) or mechanistic (ie, mediators) factors related to intervention outcomes. Methods: This work is a narrative overview of the review literature on CBT for AOD. Results: Robust evidence suggests the efficacy of classical/traditional CBT compared to minimal and usual care control conditions. CBT combined with another evidence-based treatment such as Motivational Interviewing, Contingency Management, or pharmacotherapy is also efficacious compared to minimal and usual care control conditions, but no form of CBT consistently demonstrates efficacy compared to other empirically-supported modalities. CBT and integrative forms of CBT have potential for flexible application such as use in a digital format. Data on mechanisms of action, however, are quite limited and this is despite preliminary evidence that shows that CBT effect sizes on mechanistic outcomes (ie, secondary measures of psychosocial adjustment) are moderate and typically larger than those for AOD use. Conclusion: CBT for AOD is a well-established intervention with demonstrated efficacy, effect sizes are in the small-to-moderate range, and there is potential for tailoring given the modular format of the intervention. Future work should consider mechanisms of CBT efficacy and key conditions for dissemination and implementation with fidelity. Keywords: behavioral treatment, clinical trials, mechanisms of behavior change, substance use disorder Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for alcohol and other drug use disorders (AOD) is one of the most widely studied modalities of addiction treatment in the United States and internationally. In 1985, Marlatt and Gordon published their seminal work on Relapse Prevention: Maintenance Strategies in the Treatment of Addictive Behaviors, which can be considered the "blueprint" for CBT treatment for addiction. 1 Other key publications during this time include Daley's 2 Relapse Prevention Workbook: For Recovering Alcohol and Drug Dependence Persons, Monti et a'sl 3 Treating Alcohol Dependence: A Coping Skills Training Guide, Kadden et al's 4 Project MATCH Manual for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Carroll's 5 A Cognitive Behavioral Approach: Treating Cocaine Addiction. The emergence of CBT for AOD coincided with a broader shift in psychotherapy research toward manualized, empirically-supported treatment, and an exponential growth in the number of clinical outcome trials testing the efficacy (ie, the effect of intervention compared to one or more types of experimental control conditions) of specific-modality interventions for a range of mental health conditions. As a result, CBT for AOD has an extensive empirical base and is featured in a number of practice guidelines such as those from United States' Department of Health and Human Services 6 and the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health Care Excellence. 7 A survey of US treatment facilities shows 96% of program administrators report use of relapse prevention and 94% report use of CBT, and these percentiles are second only to the reported use of "drug counseling". 8 In short, the presence of CBT for AOD in the treatment landscape can be considered ubiquitous. The question of whether one has heard of CBT might be relatively straightforward to answer, but what defines CBT is more challenging. Given its ubiquity and longevity, CBT for addiction is increasingly becoming an umbrella term for interventions that include a range of cognitive and behavioral techniques (see Table 1). For the purposes of the present discussion, we define CBT for AOD as a class of interventions that are time-limited, targeted, and based on principles of both cognitive (ie, an emphasis on the role of thoughts in shaping emotions and behaviors) and behavioral (ie, an emphasis on the role of behaviors in shaping emotions and thoughts) therapies. There is typically a phase of personalized assessment characterized by techniques such as functional analysis. Th -Abstract Truncated-