Task-Sharing in Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study of Emergency Laparotomy Performed by Physicians and Emergency Surgical Officers in 6 Ethiopian Hospitals
Samuel Carter,Beth Hochman,Nebyou Seyoum,Andualem Deneke,Belain Eyob,Brian Chang,Gregory Karelas,Sileshi Lulseged
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3569828
2020-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Background: Surgical task-sharing is a strategy allowing trained mid-level providers to perform essential surgery in low-resource areas. Despite case volumes second only to obstetric surgery, no large-scale comparative study has been previously performed examining task-sharing for acute abdominal surgery. Both general surgeons and mid-level emergency surgical officers (ESOs) perform laparotomies in the same facilities in Ethiopia, presenting an opportunity for comparative analysis of outcomes. Methods: A three-year retrospective study collected surgical case data at 4 general hospitals (n = 1540) with ESOs and MD surgeons, and 2 comparison samples from a primary (n = 100) and a tertiary (n = 142) hospital. Bivariate analysis compared mortality and morbidity stratified by provider type, sub-stratified by facility and twelve categories of emergency abdominal surgery. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the impact of provider training level on odds of perioperative mortality, complication and SSI rates, adjusting for patient age, gender, hospital facility, distance score and preoperative health score. Results: Both overall and within each general hospital across 12 diagnosis categories of emergency abdominal surgery, no significant additional risk was found for ESO mortality, complication and SSI rates. Logistic regression modeling found no additional odds of mortality, complication or surgical site infection for ESOs, controlling for patient age, gender, treatment site, distance travelled, and preoperative health. Conclusion: Emergency surgical officers at general hospitals performed a wide range of abdominal surgery with similar risks of in-hospital mortality, perioperative morbidity and surgical site infection versus similar procedures performed by physician surgeons. Cases performed by ESOs included appendectomy, bowel decompression, bowel resection, perforated peptic ulcer repair, colostomy creation, hemicolectomy, salpingectomy and oophorectomy, and abdominal trauma management with no additional detectable risk. Referral to surgical specialists remains essential in abdominal cases involving liver, spleen, gallbladder, pancreas, and complex vascular or oncological complications.Funding Statement: The funding source for this study was a grant provided by Dr. Mark Hardy, MD, Columbia University Department of Surgery, partially supported by the Il-song Education Foundation and Hallym University Global Medicine Program.Declaration of Interests: The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.Ethics Approval Statement: Ethical approval was granted by the Columbia University Medical Center Institutional Review Board with a designation of Exempt Research (IRB-AAAR9424) and by the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health (Ref. MT(1)/45/300).