Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hong-Fang Ma,Jun Shen,Bin Xu,Jian-Guo Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000035928
IF: 1.6
2023-11-29
Medicine
Abstract:The incidence of breast cancer, the most commonly diagnosed malignant tumor in women, has surpassed lung cancer in incidence and continues to increase by 0.3% per year. [ 1 , 2 ] Surgical resection treatment is a common therapeutic approach for managing early-stage breast cancer in most patients. Currently, 2 main surgical options are available: mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A multicenter study conducted in an Asian population revealed that both BCS and mastectomy therapies resulted in similar survival rates. [ 3 ] However, a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Zehra et al [ 4 ] suggested that BCS offered superior health-related quality of life outcomes for breast cancer survivors compared to mastectomy. It's worth noting that approximately 4 out of 5 breast cancer patients are diagnosed as hormone receptor-positive (HR+). [ 5 ] For these patients, 2 key adjuvant-based treatment choices come into play, namely neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and endocrine therapy (NET). These treatments can be instrumental in facilitating BCS. [ 6 , 7 ] For instance, research by Botty Van den Bruele et al [ 8 ] showcased that NCT achieved nodal pathologic complete response in a majority of patients with occult primary breast cancer. Moreover, NET has been widely adopted for postmenopausal breast cancer, particularly for cases with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), mirroring the role of NCT in HR+ breast cancer treatment. [ 9 ]
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?