Intravenous immunoglobulin for patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure: a 6-year single center retrospective review of clinical outcomes

Einav Kadour Peero,Shorooq Banjar,Rabea Khoudja,Shaonie Ton-leclerc,Coralie Beauchamp,Joanne Benoit,Marc Beltempo,Michael H. Dahan,Phil Gold,Isaac Jacques Kadoch,Wael Jamal,Carl Laskin,Neal Mahutte,Simon Phillips,Camille Sylvestre,Shauna Reinblatt,Bruce D. Mazer,William Buckett,Genevieve Genest
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54423-z
IF: 4.6
2024-02-18
Scientific Reports
Abstract:The effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure (uRIF) remains debated. We retrospectively analysed outcomes of uRIF patients treated with IVIg compared to a separate control uRIF cohort within our center (01/2014–12/2021). Primary outcomes included live birth, miscarriage, or transfer failure. We documented IVIg side effects and maternal/fetal outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess for association of IVIg exposure with outcomes and adjust for confounders. The study included 143 patients, with a 2:1 ratio of controls to patients receiving IVIg treatment. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. There was higher live birth rate (LBR) in patients receiving IVIg (32/49; 65.3%) compared to controls (32/94; 34%); p < 0.001). When stratifying patients into moderate and severe uRIF (respectively 3–4 and 5 previous good quality blastocyst transfer failures), only patients with severe uRIF benefited from IVIg (LBR (20/29 (69%) versus 5/25 (20%) for controls, p = 0.0004). In the logistic regression analysis, IVIg was associated with higher odds of live birth (OR 3.64; 95% CI 1.78–7.67; p = 0.0004). There were no serious adverse events with IVIg. IVIg can be considered in well selected patients with 5 previous unexplained, high quality blastocyst transfer failures. A randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm these findings.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?