Abstract:Paulo Cruchinho, 1 María Dolores López-Franco, 2 Manuel Luís Capelas, 3 Sofia Almeida, 4 Phillippa May Bennett, 5– 7 Marcelle Miranda da Silva, 1, 8 Gisela Teixeira, 1 Elisabete Nunes, 1 Pedro Lucas, 1 Filomena Gaspar 1 On Behalf of the Handovers4SafeCare 1 Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Center (CIDNUR) of Lisbon, Nursing School of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal; 2 CTS-464 Nursing and Innovation in Healthcare, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain; 3 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Lisboa, Portugal; 4 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Porto, Portugal; 5 Center for English, Translation, and Anglo-Portuguese Studies (CETAPS), Lisboa, Portugal; 6 Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities of the New University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal; 7 Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Coimbra, Department of Languages, Literatures and Cultures, Coimbra, Portugal; 8 Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Anna Nery Nursing School, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Correspondence: Paulo Cruchinho, Nursing School of Lisbon, Avenida Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1600-190, Portugal, Tel +351 217913400, Email Cross-cultural validation of self-reported measurement instruments for research is a long and complex process, which involves specific risks of bias that could affect the research process and results. Furthermore, it requires researchers to have a wide range of technical knowledge about the translation, adaptation and pre-test aspects, their purposes and options, about the different psychometric properties, and the required evidence for their assessment and knowledge about the quantitative data processing and analysis using statistical software. This article aimed: 1) identify all guidelines and recommendations for translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation within the healthcare sciences; 2) describe the methodological approaches established in these guidelines for conducting translation, adaptation, and cross-cultural validation; and 3) provide a practical guideline featuring various methodological options for novice researchers involved in translating, adapting, and validating measurement instruments. Forty-two guidelines on translation, adaptation, or cross-cultural validation of measurement instruments were obtained from "CINAHL with Full Text" (via EBSCO) and "MEDLINE with Full Text". A content analysis was conducted to identify the similarities and differences in the methodological approaches recommended. Bases on these similarities and differences, we proposed an eight-step guideline that includes: a) forward translation; 2) synthesis of translations; 3) back translation; 4) harmonization; 5) pre-testing; 6) field testing; 7) psychometric validation, and 8) analysis of psychometric properties. It is a practical guideline because it provides extensive and comprehensive information on the methodological approaches available to researchers. This is the first methodological literature review carried out in the healthcare sciences regarding the methodological approaches recommended by existing guidelines. Keywords: cross-cultural comparison, decision-making, psychometric properties, research design, validation studies, health services research Healthcare research requires the use of cross-culturally validated instruments to measure implementation of healthcare interventions and their outcomes through quantitative comparisons over time and across organizations. 1–4 The use of data obtained through culturally adapted evaluation instruments allows researchers, policymakers, managers and, health professionals to gain a more analytical view of the phenomena under study and to develop internationally accepted and recognized theories on the provision of patient care, based on the comparison of local data with broader data. 5 This approach also facilitates the identification of factors contributing to the effectiveness of healthcare intervention programs, 6 or other forms of Outcomes Research. This type of quantitative research, focused on the quality of healthcare provision, requires valid and reliable measuring instruments, 7 obtained through cross-cultural validation studies. These studies aim to confirm the capacity of measurement instruments developed in one culture to produce meaningful results when applied in another culture. 8 Measurement instruments can include questionnaires, tests, rating scales and self-reports, 9 the latter being also known as Patient-Reporte -Abstract Truncated-

Bridging language barriers in developing valid health policy research tools: insights from the translation and validation process of the SHEMESH questionnaire

Translation and Comprehensive Validation of the Hebrew Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS 2.0)

Identifying patients in need of palliative care: Adaptation of the Necesidades Paliativas CCOMS-ICO© (NECPAL) screening tool for use in Israel

Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research

Development and validation of Hebrew version of the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument 2.0

Translation and Adaption of Questionnaires: A Nursing Challenge

Bridging the gaps among research, policy and practice in ten low- and middle-income countries: Development and testing of a questionnaire for health-care providers

Understanding the Social Dimensions and Context in HIV Research: Instrument Adaptation Is More Than Just Translation

Linguistic Validation of the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare in Spanish and Cultural Validation for 8 Spanish Speaking Countries

Validation and cross-linguistic adaptation of the Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment (FDA-2) speech intelligibility tests: Hebrew version

Translation, cultural adaptation and linguistic validation of the postgraduate hospital educational environment measure into Arabic

Co‐production processes for translation and validation of psychosocial assessments for older adults in aged care

Perspectives of older people on environmental sustainability: A cross-cultural validation study between five countries

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Measurement Instruments: A Practical Guideline for Novice Researchers

The process and challenges of language translation and cultural adaptation of study instruments: a case study from the NIDA CTN CHOICES-2 trial

Validity Testing and Cultural Adaptation of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Among People With Chronic Diseases in Taiwan: Mixed Methods Study

Cross-culturally adapting the GHQ-12 for use with refugee populations: Opportunities, dilemmas, and challenges

Testing a Communication Assessment Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: Protocol of a Validation Study

Italian translation and cultural adaptation of health literate organisation self-assessment tool

Translation, cultural adaptation and validity assessment of the Dutch version of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire: a mixed-method approach

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of seventeen widely-used assessment instruments for child and adolescent mental health in Greece