The role of immunophenotyping in common variable immunodeficiency: a narrative review

Jana Neirinck,Malicorne Buysse,Ciel De Vriendt,Mattias Hofmans,Carolien Bonroy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2024.2404842
IF: 7.721
2024-10-06
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
Abstract:Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a heterogeneous primary immunodeficiency (PID) characterized by an impaired immunoglobulin production, in association with an increased susceptibility to infections and a diversity of clinical manifestations. This narrative review summarizes immunophenotypic abnormalities in CVID patients and their relevance for diagnosis and disease classification. A comprehensive search across four databases - PubMED, Web of Science, EMBASE and Google Scholar – yielded 170 relevant studies published between 1988 and April 31, 2023. Over the past decades, the role of immunophenotyping in CVID diagnosis has become evident by identifying "hallmark" immunophenotypic aberrancies in patient subsets, with some now integrated in the consensus diagnostic criteria. Furthermore, the role of immunophenotyping in subclassifying CVID in relation to clinical presentation and prognosis has been extensively studied. Certain immunophenotypic patterns consistently correlate with clinical manifestations and/or subsets of CVID, particularly those associated with noninfectious complications (i.e. low switched memory B cells, shifts in follicular helper T cell subsets, low naïve CD4 + T cells, low regulatory T cells, and expansion of CD21low B cells, often associated with autoimmunity and/or splenomegaly). Also, efforts to associate subset levels of innate immune cells, such as Natural Killer (NK) cells, invariant (i)NKT cells, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), and dendritic cells (DCs) to CVID complications are evident albeit in a lesser degree. However, inconsistencies regarding the role of flow cytometry in classification and prognosis persist, reflecting the disease complexity, but probably also cohort variations and methodological differences between published studies. This underscores the need for collaborative efforts to integrate emerging concepts, such as standardized flow cytometry and computational tools, for a more precise CVID classification approach. Additionally, recent studies suggest a potential value of (epi)genetic-based molecular assays to this effort.
medical laboratory technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?