Abstract:Abstract Objective To characterize the use and impact of radiation dose reduction techniques in actual practice for routine abdomen CT. Methods We retrospectively analyzed consecutive routine abdomen CT scans in adults from a large dose registry, contributed by 95 hospitals and imaging facilities. Grouping exams into deciles by, first, patient size, and second, size-adjusted dose length product (DLP), we summarized dose and technical parameters and estimated which parameters contributed most to between-protocols dose variation. Lastly, we modeled the total population dose if all protocols with mean size-adjusted DLP above 433 or 645 mGy-cm were reduced to these thresholds. Results A total of 748,846 CTs were performed using 1033 unique protocols. When sorted by patient size, patients with larger abdominal diameters had increased dose and effective mAs (milliampere seconds), even after adjusting for patient size. When sorted by size-adjusted dose, patients in the highest versus the lowest decile in size-adjusted DLP received 6.4 times the average dose (1680 vs 265 mGy-cm) even though diameter was no different (312 vs 309 mm). Effective mAs was 2.1-fold higher, unadjusted CTDI vol 2.9-fold, and phase 2.5-fold for patients in the highest versus lowest size-adjusted DLP decile. There was virtually no change in kV (kilovolt). Automatic exposure control was widely used to modulate mAs, whereas kV modulation was rare. Phase was the strongest driver of between-protocols variation. Broad adoption of optimized protocols could result in total population dose reductions of 18.6–40%. Conclusion There are large variations in radiation doses for routine abdomen CT unrelated to patient size. Modification of kV and single-phase scanning could result in substantial dose reduction. Clinical relevance Radiation dose-optimization techniques for routine abdomen CT are routinely under-utilized leading to higher doses than needed. Greater modification of technical parameters and number of phases could result in substantial reduction in radiation exposure to patients. Key Points • Based on an analysis of 748,846 routine abdomen CT scans in adults, radiation doses varied tremendously across patients of the same size and optimization techniques were routinely under-utilized. • The difference in observed dose was due to variation in technical parameters and phase count. Automatic exposure control was commonly used to modify effective mAs, whereas kV was rarely adjusted for patient size. Routine abdomen CT should be performed using a single phase, yet multi-phase was common. • kV modulation by patient size and restriction to a single phase for routine abdomen indications could result in substantial reduction in radiation doses using well-established dose optimization approaches.

S1119 How Good Does a Risk Calculator Need to Be to Triage Abdominal Imaging of Crohn's Disease in the Emergency Department?

Does clinical decision support system promote expert consensus for appropriate imaging referrals? Chest-abdominal-pelvis CT as a case study

Diagnostic Yield, Radiation Exposure, and the Role of Clinical Decision Rules to Limit Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography-Associated Complications.

Clinical Impact of Radiologist's Alert System on Patient Care for High-risk Incidental CT Findings: A Machine Learning-Based Risk Factor Analysis

The evaluation of compliance with iRefer guidelines for abdominal imaging and the impact of the normal abdominal radiograph on the clinical confidence and decision making of emergency clinicians

The influence of education on appropriateness rates for CT pulmonary angiography in emergency department patients

Large variation in radiation dose for routine abdomen CT: reasons for excess and easy tips for reduction

Application Value of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Spectrum Curve Combined with Clinical Risk Factors in Predicting Adherent Perinephric Fat.

Do we really need additional contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography for differential diagnosis in triage of middle-aged subjects with suspected biliary pain

Radiologists predict differential resource utilization but not clinical outcome in emergency department patients imaged with ultrasound for right upper quadrant pain

Utilization of a clinical prediction rule for abdominal–pelvic CT scans in patients with blunt abdominal trauma

Current abdominal X-rays practice in accident and emergency

Low-Dose Abdominal CT for Evaluating Suspected Appendicitis: Recommendations for CT Imaging Techniques and Practical Issues

How confident are UK radiographers at performing paediatric computed tomography trauma scans?

Evaluating the Accuracy and Impact of the ESR-iGuide Decision Support Tool in Optimizing CT Imaging Referral Appropriateness

Evaluation of Radiation Exposure and Influential Factors in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) of the Head and Abdomen during Interventional Procedures

Accounting for Radiation Exposure from Previous CT Exams While Deciding on the Next Exam: What Do Referring Clinicians Think?

Evaluation of Incidental Findings on Abdominopelvic CT: Potential Benefit of Photon-counting Detector CT Over Conventional Single-energy CT

Obesity is a predictor of abdominal computed tomography imaging in pediatric trauma patients

An international survey to assess use of oral and rectal contrast in CT protocols for penetrating torso trauma

Enhancing radiologist's detection: an imaging-based grading system for differentiating Crohn's disease from ulcerative colitis