A quantitative assessment of the dynamic process and potential capacity of using gypsum to reclaim sodic soil
Wenchao Zhang,Wenxin Zhang,Shujuan Wang,Zhentao Sun,Jia Liu,Yan Li,Yuqun Zhuo,Lizhen Xu,Yonggan Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-023-03535-6
IF: 3.5361
2023-01-01
Journal of Soils and Sediments
Abstract:Purpose The effectiveness of gypsum in sodic soil amelioration has been widely recognized. The basic amelioration mechanism is well known, but quantitative details are lacking; such details would clarify the process so that gypsum can be used more rationally and efficiently in actual amelioration projects of sodic land. Materials and methods Sodic soil with pH, electrical conductivity (EC), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) values of 9.4, 0.66 mS cm –1 , 43.3% and 58.6 (mmol c L −1 ) 1/2 , respectively, was sampled from the Songnen Plain. Three gypsum solutions with concentrations of 0 (CK), 1.13 (half-saturated solution; 1/2GS) and 2.26 g L –1 (saturated solution; GS) were used to leach sodic soil columns (inner diameter and depth were all 5 cm) and the variations in pH, EC and ion concentration in the leachate and soil were investigated. Results and discussion The eluent appeared at the bottom of the soil column after 1.8, 64.4 and 147.6 h for the GS, 1/2GS, and CK treatments, respectively. The rates of infiltration and salt leaching at a given time were always faster in the GS treatment, followed by the 1/2GS treatment. In the GS leachate, the curves of infiltration rate, pH, EC and HCO 3 – concentration with the cumulative volume of leachate all showed turning points at a leachate pore volume (PV) of 0.6. As leaching continued, Ca–Na exchange, followed by Ca–Mg exchange, occurred in the gypsum-treated soil. The Ca 2+ utilization rate was 96.5% and 94.4% in the GS and 1/2GS treatments, respectively, in the period of Ca–Na exchange, and the rate during Ca–Mg exchange was higher in the 1/2GS than the GS treatment. When the cumulative leachate volume reached 18 and 20 PV in the GS and 1/2GS treatments, respectively, the leachate EC and pH values were stable (the errors of three consecutive leachate samples were all within 0.5% and 0.5, respectively; equilibrium state). In the gypsum treatments, the soil pH, SAR and ESP decreased by more than 1.5 units, 13.8 (mmol c L −1 ) 1/2 and 22.3%, respectively, compared to CK. Conclusions To achieve rapid amelioration, efficient utilization of Ca 2+ , and reduced water consumption, it is suggested that the initial gypsum application rate for sodic soil amelioration be calculated on the basis of the exchangeable Na + concentration and combined with appropriate water measures to maintain a high concentration of gypsum solution, followed by multiple applications of small amounts to create a low-concentration gypsum solution environment to reduce Mg 2+ .