Is game semantics necessary?

Andreas Blass

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/9310211

1993-10-05

Abstract:We discuss the extent to which game semantics is implicit in the formalism of linear logic and in the intuitions underlying linear logic.

Logic

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Semantics of Interaction

Samson Abramsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.0121

2013-12-01

Abstract:This is an introduction to Game Semantics based on some lecture notes given at the CLiCS II summer school in Cambridge in 1995. We will focus on the recent (1994) work on Game semantics, which has led to some striking advances in the Full Abstraction problem for PCF and other programming languages. Our aim is to give a genuinely elementary first introduction; we therefore present a simplified version of game semantics, which nonetheless contains most of the essential concepts. The more complex game semantics used by Abramsky, Jagadeesan and Malacaria and by Hyland and Ong to construct fully abstract models for PCF can be seen as refinements of what we present. Some background in category theory, type theory and linear logic would be helpful in reading these notes.

Logic in Computer Science
What's in a game? A theory of game models

Clovis Eberhart,Tom Hirschowitz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.10860

2017-11-29

Abstract:Game semantics is a rich and successful class of denotational models for programming languages. Most game models feature a rather intuitive setup, yet surprisingly difficult proofs of such basic results as associativity of composition of strategies. We set out to unify these models into a basic abstract framework for game semantics, game settings. Our main contribution is the generic construction, for any game setting, of a category of games and strategies. Furthermore, we extend the framework to deal with innocence, and prove that innocent strategies form a subcategory. We finally show that our constructions cover many concrete cases, mainly among the early models and the very recent sheaf-based ones.

Logic in Computer Science,Programming Languages
A New Game Equivalence and Its Modal Logic.

Johan van Benthem,Nick Bezhanishvili,Sebastian Enqvist

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.251.5

2017-01-01

Abstract:We revisit the crucial issue of natural game equivalences, and semantics of game logics based on these. We present reasons for investigating finer concepts of game equivalence than equality of standard powers, though staying short of modal bisimulation. Concretely, we propose a more finegrained notion of equality of "basic powers" which record what players can force plus what they leave to others to do, a crucial feature of interaction. This notion is closer to game-theoretic strategic form, as we explain in detail, while remaining amenable to logical analysis. We determine the properties of basic powers via a new representation theorem, find a matching "instantial neighborhood game logic", and show how our analysis can be extended to a new game algebra and dynamic game logic.
Game Semantics: Easy as Pi

Nobuko Yoshida,Simon Castellan,Léo Stefanesco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.05248

2020-11-11

Abstract:Game semantics has proven to be a robust method to give compositional semantics for a variety of higher-order programming languages. However, due to the complexity of most game models, game semantics has remained unapproachable for non-experts. In this paper, we aim at making game semantics more accessible by viewing it as a syntactic translation into a session typed pi-calculus, referred to as metalanguage, followed by a semantics interpretation of the metalanguage into a particular game model. The syntactic translation can be defined for a wide range of programming languages without knowledge of the particular game model used. Simple reasoning on the model (soundness, and adequacy) can be done at the level of the metalanguage, escaping tedious technical proofs usually found in game semantics. We call this methodology programming game semantics. We design a metalanguage (PiDiLL) inspired from Differential Linear Logic (DiLL), which is concise but expressive enough to support features required by concurrent game semantics. We then demonstrate our methodology by yielding the first causal, non-angelic and interactive game model of CML, a higher-order call-by-value language with shared memory concurrency. We translate CML into PiDiLL and show that the translation is adequate. We give a causal and non-angelic game semantics model using event structures, which supports a simple semantics interpretation of PiDiLL. Combining both of these results, we obtain the first interactive model of a concurrent language of this expressivity which is adequate with respect to the standard weak bisimulation, and fully abstract for the contextual equivalence on second-order terms. We have implemented a prototype which can explore the generated causal object from a subset of OCaml.

Programming Languages,Logic in Computer Science
The Very Idea of Dynamic Semantics

David Israel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cmp-lg/9406026

1994-06-17

Abstract:"Natural languages are programming languages for minds." Can we or should we take this slogan seriously? If so, how? Can answers be found by looking at the various "dynamic" treatments of natural language developed over the last decade or so, mostly in response to problems associated with donkey anaphora? In Dynamic Logic of Programs, the meaning of a program is a binary relation on the set of states of some abstract machine. This relation is meant to model aspects of the effects of the execution of the program, in particular its input-output behavior. What, if anything, are the dynamic aspects of various proposed dynamic semantics for natural languages supposed to model? Is there anything dynamic to be modeled? If not, what is all the full about? We shall try to answer some, at least, of these questions and provide materials for answers to others.

Computation and Language
Synchronous Games, Simulations and lambda-calculus

Pierre Hyvernat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0905.4066

2009-05-26

Abstract:We refine a model for linear logic based on two well-known ingredients: games and simulations. We have already shown that usual simulation relations form a sound notion of morphism between games; and that we can interpret all linear logic in this way. One particularly interesting point is that we interpret multiplicative connectives by synchronous operations on games. We refine this work by giving computational contents to our simulation relations. To achieve that, we need to restrict to intuitionistic linear logic. This allows to work in a constructive setting, thus keeping a computational content to the proofs. We then extend it by showing how to interpret some of the additional structure of the exponentials. To be more precise, we first give a denotational model for the typed lambda-calculus; and then give a denotational model for the differential lambda-calculus of Ehrhard and Regnier. Both this models are proved correct constructively.

Logic in Computer Science,Logic
Disentangling Parallelism and Interference in Game Semantics

Clairambault,Pierre

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46298/lmcs-20(3:24)2024

2024-09-20

Logical Methods in Computer Science

Abstract:Game semantics is a denotational semantics presenting compositionally the computational behaviour of various kinds of effectful programs. One of its celebrated achievement is to have obtained full abstraction results for programming languages with a variety of computational effects, in a single framework. This is known as the semantic cube or Abramsky's cube, which for sequential deterministic programs establishes a correspondence between certain conditions on strategies (''innocence'', ''well-bracketing'', ''visibility'') and the absence of matching computational effects. Outside of the sequential deterministic realm, there are still a wealth of game semantics-based full abstraction results; but they no longer fit in a unified canvas. In particular, Ghica and Murawski's fully abstract model for shared state concurrency (IA) does not have a matching notion of pure parallel program-we say that parallelism and interference (i.e. state plus semaphores) are entangled. In this paper we construct a causal version of Ghica and Murawski's model, also fully abstract for IA. We provide compositional conditions parallel innocence and sequentiality, respectively banning interference and parallelism, and leading to four full abstraction results. To our knowledge, this is the first extension of Abramsky's semantic cube programme beyond the sequential deterministic world.

computer science, theory & methods,logic
Logic in Games

Johan van Benthem

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9674.001.0001

2014-01-01

Abstract:A comprehensive examination of the interfaces of logic, computer science, and game theory, drawing on twenty years of research on logic and games.This book draws on ideas from philosophical logic, computational logic, multi-agent systems, and game theory to offer a comprehensive account of logic and games viewed in two complementary ways. It examines the logic of games: the development of sophisticated modern dynamic logics that model information flow, communication, and interactive structures in games. It also examines logic as games: the idea that logical activities of reasoning and many related tasks can be viewed in the form of games.In doing so, the book takes up the “intelligent interaction” of agents engaging in competitive or cooperative activities and examines the patterns of strategic behavior that arise. It develops modern logical systems that can analyze information-driven changes in players' knowledge and beliefs, and introduces the “Theory of Play” that emerges from the combination of logic and game theory. This results in a new view of logic itself as an interactive rational activity based on reasoning, perception, and communication that has particular relevance for games.Logic in Games, based on a course taught by the author at Stanford University, the University of Amsterdam, and elsewhere, can be used in advanced seminars and as a resource for researchers.
Languages of Play: Towards semantic foundations for game interfaces

Chris Martens,Matthew A. Hammer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.05410

2017-03-15

Programming Languages

Abstract:Formal models of games help us account for and predict behavior, leading to more robust and innovative designs. While the games research community has proposed many formalisms for both the "game half" (game models, game description languages) and the "human half" (player modeling) of a game experience, little attention has been paid to the interface between the two, particularly where it concerns the player expressing her intent toward the game. We describe an analytical and computational toolbox based on programming language theory to examine the phenomenon sitting between control schemes and game rules, which we identify as a distinct player intent language for each game.
A New Game Equivalence, Its Logic and Algebra

Johan van Benthem,Nick Bezhanishvili,Sebastian Enqvist

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-018-9489-7

2018-01-01

Journal of Philosophical Logic

Abstract:We present a new notion of game equivalence that captures basic powers of interacting players. We provide a representation theorem, a complete logic, and a new game algebra for basic powers. In doing so, we establish connections with imperfect information games and epistemic logic. We also identify some new open problems concerning logic and games.
Logic Games are Complete for Game Logics

Johan van Benthem

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027306910434

2003-01-01

Studia Logica

Abstract:Game logics describe general games through powers of players for forcing outcomes. In particular, they encode an algebra of sequential game operations such as choice, dual and composition. Logic games are special games for specific purposes such as proof or semantical evaluation for first-order or modal languages. We show that the general algebra of game operations coincides with that over just logical evaluation games, whence the latter are quite general after all. The main tool in proving this is a representation of arbitrary games as modal or first-order evaluation games. We probe how far our analysis extends to product operations on games. We also discuss some more general consequences of this new perspective for standard logic.
Decisions, Actions, and Games: A Logical Perspective

Johan van Benthem

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92701-3_1

2008-01-01

Abstract:Over the past decades, logicians interested in rational agency and intelligent interaction studied major components of these phenomena, such as knowledge, belief, and preference. In recent years, standard ‘static’ logics describing information states of agents have been generalized to dynamic logics describing actions and events that produce information, revise beliefs, or change preferences, as explicit parts of the logical system. [22], [1], [12] are up-to-date accounts of this dynamic trend (the present paper follows Chapter 9 of the latter book). But in reality, concrete rational agency contains all these dynamic processes entangled. A concrete setting for this entanglement are games – and this paper is a survey of their interfaces with logic, both static and dynamic. Games are intriguing also since their analysis brings together two major streams, or tribal communities: ‘hard’ mathematical logics of computation, and ‘soft’ philosophical logics of propositional attitudes. Of course, this hard/soft distinction is spurious, and there is no natural border line between the two sources: it is their congenial mixture that makes current theories of agency so lively.
Game-theoretic semantics and partial specifications

Antti Kuusisto

2023-07-27

Abstract:We discuss partial specifications in first-order logic FO and also in a Turing-complete extension of FO. We compare the compositional and game-theoretic approaches to the systems.

Logic
Game Solution, Epistemic Dynamics and Fixed-Point Logics

Johan van Benthem,Amelie Gheerbrant

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/fi-2010-261

2010-01-01

Fundamenta Informaticae

Abstract:Current methods for solving games embody a form of "procedural rationality" that invites logical analysis in its own right. This paper is a brief case study of Backward Induction for extensive games, replacing earlier static logical definitions by stepwise dynamic ones. We consider a number of analysis from recent years that look different conceptually, and find that they are all mathematically equivalent. This shows how an abstract logical perspective can bring out basic invariant structure in games. We then generalize this to an exploration of fixed-point logics on finite trees that best fit game-theoretic equilibria. We end with some open questions that suggest a broader program for merging current computational logics with notions and results from game theory. This paper is largely a program for opening up an area: an extended version of the technical results will be found in the forthcoming dissertation [26].
Operational Semantics of Games

Yong Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.02668

2019-09-03

Abstract:We introduce operational semantics into games. And based on the operational semantics, we establish a full algebra of games, including basic algebra of games, algebra of concurrent games, recursion and abstraction. The algebra can be used widely to reason on the behaviors of systems (not only computational systems) with game theory supported.

Logic in Computer Science
Modelling Simultaneous Games in Dynamic Logic

Johan van Benthem,Sujata Ghosh,Fenrong Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9390-y

IF: 1.595

2008-01-01

Synthese

Abstract:We make a proposal for formalizing simultaneous games at the abstraction level of player’s powers, combining ideas from dynamic logic of sequential games and concurrent dynamic logic. We prove completeness for a new system of ‘concurrent game logic’ CDGL with respect to finite non-determined games. We also show how this system raises new mathematical issues, and throws light on branching quantifiers and independence-friendly evaluation games for first-order logic.
Founded Semantics and Constraint Semantics of Logic Rules

Yanhong A. Liu,Scott D. Stoller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exaa056

2020-03-26

Abstract:Logic rules and inference are fundamental in computer science and have been studied extensively. However, prior semantics of logic languages can have subtle implications and can disagree significantly, on even very simple programs, including in attempting to solve the well-known Russell's paradox. These semantics are often non-intuitive and hard-to-understand when unrestricted negation is used in recursion. This paper describes a simple new semantics for logic rules, founded semantics, and its straightforward extension to another simple new semantics, constraint semantics, that unify the core of different prior semantics. The new semantics support unrestricted negation, as well as unrestricted existential and universal quantifications. They are uniquely expressive and intuitive by allowing assumptions about the predicates, rules, and reasoning to be specified explicitly, as simple and precise binary choices. They are completely declarative and relate cleanly to prior semantics. In addition, founded semantics can be computed in linear time in the size of the ground program.

Logic in Computer Science,Artificial Intelligence,Databases,Programming Languages
Boolean Semantics for Natural Language

Johan van Benthem,Edward L. Keenan,Leonard M. Faltz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/415178

1986-01-01

Language

Abstract:In the spring of 1978, one of the authors of this book was sitting in on a course in logic for linguists given by the other author. In attempting to present some of Montague's insights in an elementar
Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé Games in Semiring Semantics

Sophie Brinke,Erich Grädel,Lovro Mrkonjić

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.04910

2023-08-09

Abstract:Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games provide a fundamental method for proving elementary equivalence (and equivalence up to a certain quantifier rank) of relational structures. We investigate the soundness and completeness of this method in the more general context of semiring semantics. Motivated originally by provenance analysis of database queries, semiring semantics evaluates logical statements not just by true or false, but by values in some commutative semiring; this can provide much more detailed information, for instance concerning the combinations of atomic facts that imply the truth of a statement, or practical information about evaluation costs, confidence scores, access levels or the number of successful evaluation strategies. There is a wide variety of different semirings that are relevant for provenance analysis, and the applicability of classical logical methods in semiring semantics may strongly depend on the algebraic properties of the underlying semiring. While Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games are sound and complete for logical equivalences in classical semantics, and thus on the Boolean semiring, this is in general not the case for other semirings. We provide a detailed analysis of the soundness and completeness of model comparison games on specific semirings, not just for classical Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games but also for other variants based on bijections or counting. Finally we propose a new kind of games, called homomorphism games, which are based on the fact that there exist certain rather simple semiring interpretations that are locally very different and can be separated even in a one-move game, but which can be proved to be elementarily equivalent via separating sets of homomorphisms into the Boolean semiring. We prove that these homomorphism games provide a sound and complete method for logical equivalences on finite and infinite lattice semirings.

Logic in Computer Science,Databases,Logic

Is game semantics necessary?

Semantics of Interaction

What's in a game? A theory of game models

A New Game Equivalence and Its Modal Logic.

Game Semantics: Easy as Pi

The Very Idea of Dynamic Semantics

Synchronous Games, Simulations and lambda-calculus

Disentangling Parallelism and Interference in Game Semantics

Logic in Games

Languages of Play: Towards semantic foundations for game interfaces

A New Game Equivalence, Its Logic and Algebra

Logic Games are Complete for Game Logics

Decisions, Actions, and Games: A Logical Perspective

Game-theoretic semantics and partial specifications

Game Solution, Epistemic Dynamics and Fixed-Point Logics

Operational Semantics of Games

Modelling Simultaneous Games in Dynamic Logic

Founded Semantics and Constraint Semantics of Logic Rules

Boolean Semantics for Natural Language

Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé Games in Semiring Semantics