Abstract:By conducting field research and analysing judgments delivered in Beijing courts from 2004 to 2011, we find that the popular notion held by China's trade partners of the inadequacy of intellectual property protection is only partly supported by the empirical evidence. The likelihood of winning lawsuits is higher for foreign than domestic plaintiffs and the extremely low damages ruled by Chinese courts are due to particular causes. Courts lack consistent methods to calculate incurred losses in intellectual property right (IPR) infringements and consequently routinely apply the statutory damages whose upper limit is restricted by legislation. Efforts by Chinese legislators to enhance compensation by lifting the upper limit of awardable statutory damages in the Third Amendment of Chinese Patent Law (2008) did not seem to have an effect on our sample. Chinese policymakers should instead focus on the cause of the issue by providing more implementable guidelines for courts to calculate losses. Courts need to develop applicable conventions for calculating damages, based on objective criteria of how much compensation ought to be payable, which is also the basis of calculating reasonable statutory damages. Thus, the new provision of the "right of information" on pirated goods proposed by the ongoing Fourth Amendment provides a significant weapon to combat counterfeiting.

Can patentee preference in patent infringement dispute resolution impact innovation?

The impact of patent infringement litigation decisions on firms' innovation performance in China

Intellectual property judicial protection, innovation factor input, and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of intellectual property courts in China

Invention or Incremental Improvement? Simulation Modeling and Empirical Testing of Firm Patenting Behavior under Performance Aspiration

Does Property Rights Protection Affect Firm Innovation? Evidence from the Chinese Property Rights Law Enactment

Patent Litigation, Patent Value and the Direction of Innovation: Evidence from China

Invention or Incremental Improvement?

Do Stronger Patents Stimulate or Stifle Innovation? the Crucial Role of Financial Development

Study on the Patent Infringement Litigation and Patent Invalidation Trial Processes in the Biopharmaceutical Industry in China

Does Administrative Approval Impede Low-Quality Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms

PATENTABILITY, R&D DIRECTION, AND CUMULATIVE INNOVATION

Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Firm Innovation: Evidence from Half Million Firms in China

Patent Regime Shift and Firm Innovation: Evidence from the Second Amendment to China’s Patent Law

Adjustment of Patent Law and the Independent Innovation

The impact of judicial protection of intellectual property on digital innovation: Evidence from China

Does Patent Help to Build Investment Portfolio of China A-Shares under China-US Trade Conflict?

How Fair is Patent Litigation in China? Evidence from the Beijing Courts

Intellectual Property Protection, Financial Innovation and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

Intellectual property protection, infringement disputes, and, corporate innovation investment persistence

Cracking down on the infringement and counterfeiting: Intellectual property rights and corporate innovation in China

THE SELF-REPORTED PATENT QUALITY OF CHINESE FIRMS: MOTIVATION SOURCE AND TECHNOLOGY ACCUMULATION EFFECTS ANALYSIS