Abstract:Background Social factors associated with poor childbirth outcomes and experiences of maternity care include minority ethnicity, poverty, young motherhood, homelessness, difficulty speaking or understanding English, migrant or refugee status, domestic violence, mental illness and substance abuse. It is not known what specific aspects of maternity care work to improve the maternal and neonatal outcomes for these under-served, complex populations. Methods This study aimed to compare maternal and neonatal clinical birth outcomes for women with social risk factors accessing different models of maternity care. Quantitative data on pregnancy and birth outcome measures for 1000 women accessing standard care, group practice and specialist models of care at two large, inner-city maternity services were prospectively collected and analysed using multinominal regression. The level of continuity of care and place of antenatal care were used as independent variables to explore these potentially influential aspects of care. Outcomes adjusted for women’s social and medical risk factors and the service attended. Results Women who received standard maternity care were significantly less likely to use water for pain relief in labour (RR 0.11, CI 0.02–0.62) and have skin to skin contact with their baby shortly after birth (RR 0.34, CI 0.14–0.80) compared to the specialist model of care. Antenatal care based in the hospital setting was associated with a significant increase in preterm birth (RR 2.38, CI 1.32–4.27) and low birth weight (RR 2.31, CI 1.24–4.32), and a decrease in induction of labour (RR 0.65, CI 0.45–0.95) compared to community-based antenatal care, this was despite women’s medical risk factors. A subgroup analysis found that preterm birth was increased further for women with the highest level of social risk accessing hospital-based antenatal care (RR 3.11, CI1.49–6.50), demonstrating the protective nature of community-based antenatal care. Conclusions This research highlights how community-based antenatal care, with a focus on continuity of carer reduced health inequalities and improved maternal and neonatal clinical outcomes for women with social risk factors. The findings support the current policy drive to increase continuity of midwife-led care, whilst adding that community-based care may further improve outcomes for women at increased risk of health inequalities. The relationship between community-based models of care and neonatal outcomes require further testing in future research. The identification of specific mechanisms such as help-seeking and reduced anxiety, to explain these findings are explored in a wider evaluation.

Improving well-being among women in neonatology

Team-Led Empowerment: A Toolkit Enhancing NOWS Care

Evaluating and Enhancing Nursing Caregiver Well-being Using a Systematic Approach

The wellbeing shelf: A mixed methods study exploring the impact of a resilience web resource for first year nursing and midwifery students

Improving Outcomes for Moms and Babies Through Educating Nurses in Rural Zambia

Exploring drivers of women's well-being in hospitals: mapping the landscape

Advanced nurse practitioner well-being: A 4-year cohort mixed methods study

Managing well-being in paediatric critical care: a multiperspective qualitative study of nurses and allied health professionals experiences

The Power of Nursing

Nurse Well-Being and Patient-Specific Outcomes

Workforce Engagement for Compassionate Advocacy, Resilience, and Empowerment (WE CARE): An Evidence-Based Wellness Program

What is known about midwives' well-being and resilience? An integrative review of the international literature

Nurse well-being: A concept analysis

Examining Well-Being and Healthy Lifestyle Interventions among Nursing Students Worldwide: A Scoping Review

Project20: Does continuity of care and community-based antenatal care improve maternal and neonatal birth outcomes for women with social risk factors? A prospective, observational study

Amplifying Their Voice: Inclusive Healthcare Provider Perspectives to Improve Advancement, Resilience, and Retention

What Keeps Neonatal Nurses Up at Night and What Gets Them Up in the Morning?

Time-out for well-being: A mixed methods evaluation of attitudes and likelihood to engage in different types of online emotional well-being programmes in the perinatal period

Perceived changes in competence, relatedness, and autonomy reported by mothers since joining a mom-centered digital community

On cloud nine? Maternal emotional wellbeing six weeks up to one year postpartum - A cross-sectional study

A narrative review of positive psychology interventions for women during the perinatal period