Abstract:Background: Individuals with developmental language disorder or Williams syndrome are reported to use more gestures than individuals with typical development. However, these two groups differ considerably in visuospatial and language skills, two skills that are hypothesized to shape gesture rate. Aims: We first examined whether children with both developmental language disorder and children Williams syndrome do indeed use more gestures. Our second aim was to disentangle the role of vocabulary and visuospatial skills in the use of supplementary gestures (i.e., containing unique information). To account for participant heterogeneity, analyses included both group comparisons and vocabulary and visuospatial skills at an individual level. As a third aim, the role of visuospatial skills was further examined in relation to gestures containing spatial content. Methods & procedures: In a cross-sectional group design, three participant groups watched and then retold a cartoon: children with typical development (n = 25), children with developmental language disorder (n = 25) and children/young people with Williams syndrome (n = 14). Their narrations were transcribed and hand gestures were coded based on gesture-speech integration (redundant, adds information to particular lexical items, gives information that is entirely absent from speech) and spatial content. Participants' expressive vocabulary and visuospatial skills were measured. Outcomes & results: Between-group comparisons showed that individuals with developmental language disorder or Williams syndrome did indeed use more gestures. Poisson loglinear modelling demonstrated that a relative higher use of supplementary gestures was determined by lower expressive vocabulary skills. Neither the group distinction nor visuospatial skills shaped the supplementary gesture rate nor spatial gesture rate. Conclusions & implications: Regardless of neurodevelopmental condition or typical development, a higher use of supplementary gestures was influenced by expressive vocabulary skills. Children with lower vocabulary skills spontaneously capitalized on the multimodality of communication to express constituents that were not present in their verbal speech. This finding is a promising starting point for future gesture intervention studies examining whether implicit modelling of gesture use can encourage gestures even more in these children and if this allows them to achieve higher linguistic complexity. On a methodological note, the observed intra-group skill variability demonstrates that group comparisons need to be complemented with correlational measures accounting for skills at an individual level. What this paper adds: What is already known on the subject Children with developmental language disorder and children with Williams syndrome are more inclined to use gestures than typically developing children. Research conducted in adults with typical development points towards the role of lexical and visuospatial skills in gesture use, but it is unclear how these skills shape gesture use in children with atypical development. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study compares the rate of gestures that convey meaning that is not expressed in speech between the three aforementioned populations. Novel is the inclusion of the group distinction, individual lexical skills, and visuospatial skills in one encompassing statistical model. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The inclination to use gestures that replace speech is related to lexical skills. Visuospatial skills do not seem to play a role and should not be considered as a factor when thinking about gesture intervention. Understanding how gestures relate to specific skills is a first step to understanding how gesture interventions can bolster language production.

Relationship Between Gestures and Vocabulary in 14‐Month‐Old Swedish‐Learning Children

Gesture-speech integration is related to vocabulary skills in children with developmental language disorder, Williams syndrome and typical development

The role of dyadic combinations of infants' behaviors and caregivers' verbal and multimodal responses in predicting vocabulary outcomes

Do Spoken Vocabulary and Gestural Production Distinguish Children with Transient Language Delay from Children Who Will Show Developmental Language Disorder? A Pilot Study

The link between early iconic gesture comprehension and receptive language

Relation of infants' and mothers' pointing to infants' vocabulary measured directly and with parental reports

Does Gestural Communication Influence Later Spoken Language Ability in Minimally Verbal Autistic Children?

The relationship between recall accuracy and the use of gestures according to age and word meaning structure

The Natural Language Environment of 9-Month-Old Infants in Sweden and Concurrent Association With Early Language Development

Qualitative and quantitative aspects of child-directed parental talk and the relation to 2-year-old's developing vocabulary

The "what" and "when" of language input to children: Linguistic and temporal predictors of vocabulary in 3-year-olds

Lexical skills and gesture use: A comparison between expressive and receptive/expressive late talkers

Children Use Non-referential Gestures in Narrative Speech to Mark Discourse Elements Which Update Common Ground

Early gesture use predicts children's language development in South Korea: New evidence supporting the cross‐cultural importance of pointing

Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary

Multimodal representational gestures in the transition to multi-word productions

Preschool children's discourse competence in different genres and how it relates to iconic gestures

Mother-infant object involvement at 9 and 15 months: relation to infant cognition and early vocabulary

Do 14-17-month-old infants use iconic speech and gesture cues to interpret word meanings?a)

The role of pointing gestures and eye gaze in second language vocabulary learning

Infants who develop autism show smaller inventories of deictic and symbolic gestures at 12 months of age