Abstract:<p>Most cognitive processes are studied using abstract or synthetic stimuli with specific features to fully control what is presented to subjects. However, recent studies have revealed enhancements of cognitive capacities (such as working memory) when processing naturalistic versus abstract stimuli. Using abstract stimuli constructed from distinct visual features (e.g., color and shape), we have recently shown that human subjects can learn multidimensional stimulus-reward associations via initially estimating reward value of individual features (feature-based learning) before gradually switching to learning about reward value of individual stimuli (object-based learning). Here, we examined whether similar strategies are adopted during learning about naturalistic stimuli that are clearly perceived as objects (instead of a combination of features) and contain both task-relevant and irrelevant features. We found that similar to learning about abstract stimuli, subjects initially adopted feature-based learning more strongly before transitioning to object-based learning. However, there were three key differences between learning about naturalistic and abstract stimuli. First, compared with abstract stimuli, the initial learning strategy was less feature-based for naturalistic stimuli. Second, subjects transitioned to object-based learning faster for naturalistic stimuli. Third, unexpectedly, subjects were more likely to adopt feature-based learning for naturalistic stimuli, both at the steady state and overall. These results suggest that despite the stronger tendency to perceive naturalistic stimuli as objects, which leads to greater likelihood of using object-based learning as the initial strategy and a faster transition to object-based learning, the influence of individual features on learning is stronger for these stimuli such that ultimately the object-based strategy is adopted less. Overall, our findings suggest that feature-based learning is a general initial strategy for learning about reward value of all types of multi-dimensional stimuli.</p>

Stimulus valence moderates self-learning

Information about action outcomes differentially affects learning from self-determined versus imposed choices

Differential neural processing of reward and self-relevance in a social gambling paradigm

The Automatic and the Expected Self: Separating Self- and Familiarity Biases Effects by Manipulating Stimulus Probability.

Emotional cues reduce Pavlovian interference in feedback-based go and nogo learning

Learning arbitrary stimulus-reward associations for naturalistic stimuli involves transition from learning about features to learning about objects

More than skin deep: about the influence of self-relevant avatars on inhibitory control

Early Salience Signals Predict Interindividual Asymmetry in Decision Accuracy Across Rewarding and Punishing Contexts

Signals in Human Striatum Are Appropriate for Policy Update Rather Than Value Prediction

Temporal Properties of Self-Prioritization

Neural mechanisms for learning self and other ownership

The temporal profile of self-prioritization

Reward produces learning of a consciously inaccessible feature

Affective learning: Awareness and aversion

Preliminary Evidence for A Role of the Personality Trait in Visual Perceptual Learning

Emotional stimuli boost incidental learning through predictive processing

Self-prioritization of fully unfamiliar stimuli

Aversive anticipations modulate electrocortical correlates of decision-making and reward reversal learning, but not behavioral performance

Intertwining personal and reward relevance: evidence from the drift-diffusion model

Suboptimal choice in rats: Incentive salience attribution promotes maladaptive decision-making

Valence ambiguity dynamically shapes striatal dopamine heterogeneity