Abstract:Background. The global COVID-19 pandemic has triggered a fundamental reexamination of how human psychological research can be conducted both safely and robustly in a new era of digital working and physical distancing. Online web-based testing has risen to the fore as a promising solution for rapid mass collection of cognitive data without requiring human contact. However, a long-standing debate exists over the data quality and validity of web-based studies. Here, we examine the opportunities and challenges afforded by the societal shift toward web-based testing, highlight an urgent need to establish a standard data quality assurance framework for online studies, and develop and validate a new supervised online testing methodology, remote guided testing (RGT). Methods. A total of 85 healthy young adults were tested on 10 cognitive tasks assessing executive functioning (flexibility, memory and inhibition) and learning. Tasks were administered either face-to-face in the laboratory (N=41) or online using remote guided testing (N=44), delivered using identical web-based platforms (CANTAB, Inquisit and i-ABC). Data quality was assessed using detailed trial-level measures (missed trials, outlying and excluded responses, response times), as well as overall task performance measures. Results. The results indicated that, across all measures of data quality and performance, RGT data was statistically-equivalent to data collected in person in the lab. Moreover, RGT participants out-performed the lab group on measured verbal intelligence, which could reflect test environment differences, including possible effects of mask-wearing on communication. Conclusions. These data suggest that the RGT methodology could help to ameliorate concerns regarding online data quality and - particularly for studies involving high-risk or rare cohorts - offer an alternative for collecting high-quality human cognitive data without requiring in-person physical attendance.

Moving Behavioral Experimentation Online: A Tutorial and Some Recommendations for Drift Diffusion Modeling

A practical introduction to using the drift diffusion model of decision-making in cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and health sciences

Switching to online: Testing the validity of supervised remote testing for online reinforcement learning experiments

Supporting Remote Experimentation Through Computer-Mediated Communication

The Online Laboratory: Conducting Experiments in a Real Labor Market

Conducting organizational survey and experimental research online: From convenient to ambitious in study designs, recruiting, and data quality

Gorilla in our Midst: An online behavioral experiment builder

A Primer on Using Behavioral Data for Testing Theories in Advertising Research

Online Field Experiments: a Selective Survey of Methods

Statistical Challenges in Online Controlled Experiments: A Review of A/B Testing Methodology

Using Adaptive Bandit Experiments to Increase and Investigate Engagement in Mental Health

Online shopping adoption during COVID-19 and social isolation: Extending the UTAUT model with herd behavior

Conducting Perception Research over the Internet: a Tutorial Review

Testing the drift-diffusion model

Integrating behavioral experimental findings into dynamical models to inform social change interventions

Online Controlled Experiments for Personalised e-Commerce Strategies: Design, Challenges, and Pitfalls

Conducting large, repeated, multi-game economic experiments using mobile platforms

Flexible Online Repeated Measures Experiment

Experiments in Social Media

A New Remote Guided Method for Supervised Web-Based Cognitive Testing to Ensure High Quality Data

Algorithmic Drift: A Simulation Framework to Study the Effects of Recommender Systems on User Preferences