Use of the Prostatype P-score to predict adverse pathology (AP) at radical prostatectomy (RP).

Gerald L. Andriole,Emelie Berglund,Steven Gaal,Vladimir J.N. Bykov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.276
IF: 45.3
2024-02-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:276 Background: Men with low or favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa) may undergo Active Surveillance (AS) or curative treatment. Among the factors patients and clinicians use to determine which approach to take is the likelihood of AP at RP. Nomograms using clinical parameters alone or along with GC’s have been used to aid in the prediction of AP at RP. The Prostatype test has been developed from prostate biopsy specimens of men with localized PCa. It has been validated in 2 large studies to accurately predict 10-year Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality and 10-year Prostate Cancer Metastasis. The Prostatype test is generated from the signature of 3 embryonic stem cell genes (IGFBP3, F3, and VGLL3) measured from the biopsy along with clinical data (PSA, Gleason Score, and T-stage). Its intended use is to guide treatment decisions in men currently on or considering AS. The Prostatype test is CE marked and is available for clinical use in Europe. Methods: To validate the ability of the Prostatype test performed on prostate biopsy tissue to predict AP (Gleason score 4+3 or higher and/or non-organ confined disease (pT3)) at RP, we studied 214 patients (Median age 65 (59,68); Median PSA 7.6 (5.3, 11.1); 20% Gleason 6; 64% Gleason 7; 16% Gleason >8) who underwent RP, of which 117 (55%) had AP. The model to predict AP at RP is an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm. Results: This ANN showed excellent performance, e.g., great balance between precision and sensitivity and had a high overall accuracy (AUC of 0.88) at predicting AP at RP. This 5-layer ANN model includes IGFBP3, F3, % positive biopsies and biopsy primary Gleason score. Confusion matrix measurement of the performance of the model shows it minimizes misclassification of patients with AP, and together with the Matthews Correlation coefficient (0.639) provides evidence that the ANN model manages false positives and false negatives correctly. Conclusions: This study shows that the Prostatype test is a strong predictor of AP at RP and may be used to guide decision making of clinicians and patients who are currently on or considering AS.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?