Abstract:Bulking sludge problems are commonly reported in biological nutrient removal (BNR) systems. This has led to the general belief that intrinsic BNR conditions favor the growth of undesirable and excessive filamentous bacteria. The present study shows that other factors have a major role in bulking, and not the BNR conditions. These factors have been verified in well-controlled, strictly anoxic-aerobic and strictly anaerobic-aerobic sequencing batch reactor systems. The experimental results show that conditions known to be responsible for bulking sludge in aerobic systems (i.e., low concentration of electron donor and/or electron acceptor) did not lead to bulking. Even when acetate was present at very low concentrations in the aerobic stage of an anaerobic-aerobic bio-P system, the sludge settleability remained very good. This clearly demonstrates that good bio-P activity can stabilize and improve sludge settleability. The presence of microaerophilic conditions in the anoxic stage of the anoxic-aerobic system was the only factor leading to worsening sludge settling characteristics. The results are discussed in light of our previous hypothesis about the importance of diffusion-limited substrate uptake for the development of filamentous structures in biological flocs. The hypothesis is extended to anaerobic-aerobic and anoxic-aerobic conditions, typical of BNR-activated sludge systems. Taking into account the effect of feeding patterns on biochemical rates and on the development of filamentous bacterial structures, we recommend the adoption of plug-flow selector configurations, with strictly anaerobic and/or strictly anoxic conditions, wherein microaerophilic conditions are excluded, in order to maintain reliable and robust BNR performance.

Bulking of activated sludge in the biological treatment of municipal and industrial wastewater, due to the massive development of filamentous bacteria Type 021N

Role of Adding Dried Sludge Micropowder in Aerobic Granular Sludge Reactor with Extended Filamentous Bacteria

Results of Adding Sludge Micropowder for Microbial Structure and Partial Nitrification and Denitrification in a Filamentous AGS-SBR Using High-Ammonia Wastewater

Roles of Bacterial and Epistylis Populations in Aerobic Granular SBRs Treating Domestic and Synthetic Wastewaters

Analysis of Bacterial, Fungal and Archaeal Populations from a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Developing an Innovative Aerobic Granular Sludge Process

Bulking sludge in biological nutrient removal systems

Population Dynamics of Bulking and Foaming Bacteria in a Full-scale Wastewater Treatment Plant over Five Years

Effects of Microbiological Diversity in the Anoxic-Oxic-settling-anaerobic Process Strengthened by Humic Biological Composite Fillers

Improving anammox performance by limited filamentous bulking for wastewater treatment with organic stress

Research on Filamentous Bulking in Aerobic Granular Sludge

A comprehensive comparison between non-bulking and bulking aerobic granular sludge in microbial communities

Insight into sludge bulking in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant: Quorum sensing, microbial community, and metabolic characteristics

Control of Sludge Bulking Caused by Unknown Reason Through FeCl3 Coupled with Biochemical Methods

Filamentous Granular Sludge Bulking in a Laboratory Scale UASB Reactor.

[Performance, Sludge Characteristics, and the Microbial Community Dynamics of Bulking Sludge under Different Nitrogen and Phosphorus Imbalances].

A novel bioflocculant produced by Klebsiella sp. and its application to sludge dewatering

Filamentous Bacteria-Induced Sludge Bulking Can Alter Antibiotic Resistance Gene Profiles and Increase Potential Risks in Wastewater Treatment Systems

Pathways of inhibition of filamentous sludge bulking by slowly biodegradable organic compounds

Aerobic biological treatment of thermophilically digested sludge

A sludge bulking wastewater treatment plant with an oxidation ditch-denitrification filter in a cold region: bacterial community composition and antibiotic resistance genes

Substrate uptake tests and quantitative FISH show differences in kinetic growth of bulking and non-bulking activated sludge