Electrophysiology, molecular modelling, and functional analysis of the effects of dietary quercetin and flavonoid analogues on Kir6.1 channels in rat stomach fundus smooth muscle
Francesco Pettini,Ottavia Spiga,Simone Furini,Fabio Fusi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2023.115969
Abstract:Flavonoids, ubiquitously distributed in the plant world, are regularly ingested with diets rich in fruit, vegetables, wine, and tea. During digestion, they are partially absorbed in the stomach. The present work aimed to assess the in vitro effects of quercetin and ten structurally related flavonoids on the rat gastric fundus smooth muscle, focussing on ATP-dependent K+ (Kir6.1) channels, which play a central role in the regulation of resting membrane potential, membrane excitability and, consequently, of gastric motility. Whole-cell currents through Kir6.1 channels (IKir6.1) were recorded with the patch-clamp technique and the mechanical activity of gastric fundus smooth muscle strips was studied under isometric conditions. Galangin ≈ tamarixetin > quercetin > kaempferol > isorhamnetin ≈ luteolin ≈ fisetin > (±)-taxifolin inhibited pinacidil-evoked, glibenclamide-sensitive IKir6.1 in a concentration-dependent manner. Morin, rutin, and myricetin were ineffective. The steric hindrance of the molecule and the number and position of hydroxyl groups on the B ring played an important role in the activity of the molecule. Molecular docking simulations revealed a possible binding site for flavonoids in the C-terminal domain of the Kir6.1 channel subunit SUR2B, in a flexible loop formed by residues 251 to 254 of chains C and D. Galangin and tamarixetin, but not rutin relaxed both high K+- and carbachol-induced contraction of fundus strips in a concentration-dependent manner. Furthermore, both flavonoids shifted to the right the concentration-relaxation curves to either pinacidil or L-cysteine constructed in strips pre-contracted by high K+, rutin being ineffective. In conclusion, IKir6.1 inhibition exerted by dietary flavonoids might counterbalance their myorelaxant activity, affect gastric accommodation or, at least, some stages of digestion.