Abstract:Background: Despite numerous counteracting efforts, antivaccine content linked to delays and refusals to vaccinate has grown persistently on social media, while only a few provaccine campaigns have succeeded in engaging with or persuading the public to accept immunization. Many prior studies have associated the diversity of topics discussed by antivaccine advocates with the public's higher engagement with such content. Nonetheless, a comprehensive comparison of discursive topics in pro- and antivaccine content in the engagement-persuasion spectrum remains unexplored. Objective: We aimed to compare discursive topics chosen by pro- and antivaccine advocates in their attempts to influence the public to accept or reject immunization in the engagement-persuasion spectrum. Our overall objective was pursued through three specific aims as follows: (1) we classified vaccine-related tweets into provaccine, antivaccine, and neutral categories; (2) we extracted and visualized discursive topics from these tweets to explain disparities in engagement between pro- and antivaccine content; and (3) we identified how those topics frame vaccines using Entman's four framing dimensions. Methods: We adopted a multimethod approach to analyze discursive topics in the vaccine debate on public social media sites. Our approach combined (1) large-scale balanced data collection from a public social media site (ie, 39,962 tweets from Twitter); (2) the development of a supervised classification algorithm for categorizing tweets into provaccine, antivaccine, and neutral groups; (3) the application of an unsupervised clustering algorithm for identifying prominent topics discussed on both sides; and (4) a multistep qualitative content analysis for identifying the prominent discursive topics and how vaccines are framed in these topics. In so doing, we alleviated methodological challenges that have hindered previous analyses of pro- and antivaccine discursive topics. Results: Our results indicated that antivaccine topics have greater intertopic distinctiveness (ie, the degree to which discursive topics are distinct from one another) than their provaccine counterparts (t122=2.30, P=.02). In addition, while antivaccine advocates use all four message frames known to make narratives persuasive and influential, provaccine advocates have neglected having a clear problem statement. Conclusions: Based on our results, we attribute higher engagement among antivaccine advocates to the distinctiveness of the topics they discuss, and we ascribe the influence of the vaccine debate on uptake rates to the comprehensiveness of the message frames. These results show the urgency of developing clear problem statements for provaccine content to counteract the negative impact of antivaccine content on uptake rates.

Algorithmic Detection and Analysis of Vaccine-Denialist Sentiment Clusters in Social Networks

Detecting Anti-Vaccine Users on Twitter

Characterizing polarization in online vaccine discourse-A large-scale study

Automated clustering of COVID-19 anti-vaccine discourse on Twitter

Detecting Anti-vaccine Content on Twitter using Multiple Message-Based Network Representations

Assessing Vaccination Sentiments with Online Social Media: Implications for Infectious Disease Dynamics and Control

Tracking the Structure and Sentiment of Vaccination Discussions on Mumsnet

Using Machine Learning to Compare Provaccine and Antivaccine Discourse Among the Public on Social Media: Algorithm Development Study

Vaccine skepticism detection by network embedding

Deep Learning Reveals Patterns of Diverse and Changing Sentiments Towards COVID-19 Vaccines Based on 11 Million Tweets

Detecting the Presence of COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy from South African Twitter Data Using Machine Learning

Categorizing Vaccine Confidence With a Transformer-Based Machine Learning Model: Analysis of Nuances of Vaccine Sentiment in Twitter Discourse

The Dynamics of Health Behavior Sentiments on a Large Online Social Network

Deep Learning-Based Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Responses from Twitter Data

An analysis of vaccine-related sentiments from development to deployment of COVID-19 vaccines

Examining the Prevailing Negative Sentiments Related to COVID-19 Vaccination: Unsupervised Deep Learning of Twitter Posts over a 16 Month Period

Demystifying the COVID-19 vaccine discourse on Twitter

Sentimental and spatial analysis of COVID-19 vaccines tweets

Patterns of diverse and changing sentiments towards COVID-19 vaccines: a sentiment analysis study integrating 11 million tweets and surveillance data across over 180 countries

COVID vaccine stigma: detecting stigma across social media platforms with computational model based on deep learning

Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Sentiment Analysis from June 2011 to April 2019