Abstract:Effectively addressing environmental challenges such as climate change will require adopting policy measures that have some impact on collective human behavior. The present research examined attitudes toward different environmental policies, specifically focusing on the role of perceived justice. Justice was measured in two ways: as an assessment of the fairness of a particular policy and as a general tendency to endorse statements related to environmental justice. Because justice judgments can be context specific, policies were presented in four conditions, in a 2 × 2 design manipulating the type of impact described, ecological or societal, and the level of focus, individual or collective. The roles of political ideology and environmentalism were also investigated. Results from an online sample of 162 US residents showed that non-coercive policies, overall, were rated as more acceptable. Environmental justice statements were strongly endorsed, and justice in both its specific and general forms was a determinant of policy acceptance. In particular, ratings of the fairness of specific policies were a stronger determinant of acceptability than perceived effectiveness of the policy. Type of impact had little effect, but policies tended to be rated as more acceptable when they were framed in terms of the collective rather than the individual. Although a liberal ideology was associated with acceptance of environmental policies in general and with endorsement of environmental justice, controlling for endorsement of environmental justice eliminated the effect of political ideology in most, but not all, cases. Implications for policy support are discussed.

Solidarity‐based collective action among third parties: The role of emotion regulation and moral outrage

Moral Outrage as the Emotional Response to Climate Injustice

How Emotions Can Enhance Crisis Communication: Theorizing Around Moral Outrage

Yes, we care! Consumer emotional responses to corporate neglect of climate change and the role of individual differences

Is brand activism an emotional affair? The role of moral emotions in consumer responses to brand activism

The place and role of (moral) anger in organizational behavior studies

An Extended Model of Moral Outrage at Corporate Social Irresponsibility

Is Online Moral Outrage Outrageous? Rethinking the Indignation Machine

Emotional signatures of climate policy support

What is Moral about Moral Outrage?

Emotion work in animal rights activism

Evidence of emotions and psychological defences in urban water-efficiency campaigns' communications

The Role of Perceived Justice, Political Ideology, and Individual or Collective Framing in Support for Environmental Policies

Moral Emotions and Unnamed Wrongs: Revisiting Epistemic Injustice

Agency and intentionality-dependent experiences of moral emotions

Anger and disgust shape judgments of social sanctions across cultures, especially in high individual autonomy societies

Exploring the Moral Challenges of Confronting High-Carbon-Emitting Behavior: The Role of Emotions and Media Coverage

Social identity shapes antecedents and functional outcomes of moral emotion expression in online networks

Individuating anger and other emotions: Lessons from disgust