Abstract:Following the thriving literature on the impacts of ESG performance on corporate financing, this paper investigates corporate ESG performance and debt-financing using a sample of Chinese listed firms. We pay special attention to the influence of rating disagreements across different agencies. While the positive role of ESG performance on the cost and amount of corporate debt financing is revealed, clear heterogeneity is found. More importantly, we uncover the role of rating disagreement, and find that only firms with agreed high ESG rating can benefit through lost cost and larger amount debt-financing. The results confirm the needs for firms to improve information disclosure and pay special attention to ESG performance. Moreover, improving ESG rating quality and establishing a consistent and effective rating system deserve regulators' attention.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and corporate external financing, particularly debt financing, and focuses on analyzing the impact of discrepancies in ESG ratings given by different rating agencies for the same company. Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following key issues:
1. **How does ESG performance affect corporate debt financing?** The paper studies how ESG advantages can help companies reduce financing costs and expand financing scale from two perspectives: the cost of debt financing and the size of financing. It finds that by enhancing social reputation and information transparency, ESG advantages can effectively alleviate the constraints of corporate debt financing.
2. **What is the role of ESG rating discrepancies?** Significant discrepancies in ESG ratings by different third-party rating agencies for the same company may damage investors' trust, leading to capital withdrawal. High discrepancies in ESG ratings may also suggest that a company is engaging in "greenwashing," i.e., falsely disclosing ESG information, which can harm the company's reputation. The paper emphasizes that only companies with consistent high ESG ratings can truly benefit from low-cost and large-scale debt financing.
3. **Heterogeneity analysis**: The paper also examines how different industry characteristics (such as high carbon emission industries), the nature of the company (such as private enterprises), whether regular corporate social responsibility reports are disclosed, and whether details of pollutant emissions are disclosed, affect the impact of ESG advantages on corporate debt financing. For example, for high carbon emission industries and private enterprises, the positive effects of ESG advantages are more significant because these companies face greater challenges in social reputation and information transparency.
4. **The relationship between ESG rating discrepancies and corporate debt financing**: The paper proposes that ESG rating discrepancies may weaken the positive effects brought by ESG advantages, especially when the ratings are controversial. High ESG ratings in such cases may be seen as a signal of corporate "greenwashing," thereby damaging its credibility in the eyes of creditors and investors, leading to the ineffectiveness of ESG advantages.
In summary, through empirical analysis, the paper reveals the complex relationship between ESG performance and corporate debt financing, emphasizing the importance of improving the quality of ESG ratings and establishing a consistent and effective rating system to promote the development of green finance and investment systems.