Abstract:Purpose Agency theory postulates that research and development (R&D) investments are subject to managerial discretion and thus may not enhance firm value as expected. The inconclusive empirical findings in the literature is a testament of that. This paper aims to investigate the interplay between board gender diversity (i.e. women on boards) and value relevance of firms' effort to innovate as indicated by firms' R&D investments. Design/methodology/approach Through a sample of 1,626 US-listed firms from the period 2004 to 2019, the authors examine whether board gender diversity promotes or hampers value relevance of firms' efforts to innovate. The authors use ordinary least squares as the baseline model and address potential endogeneity through instrumental variable two-stage least square, and selection bias through Heckman selection model. Finally, the authors use the financial crisis of 2008 as a natural experiment to investigate the effect of board gender diversity during the crisis period. Findings The results show that board gender diversity positively moderates the relation between R&D and firm value. In times of financial crisis, R&D does not destroy firm value in firms with gender diverse board. The results are robust to measurement error, endogeneity issue, particularly simultaneity and selection bias. Practical implications The findings in this study have several practical implications. Firms that invest heavily in R&D should be mindful of gender diversity in their board recruitment strategies to enhance innovation outputs and firm value. Current and potential investors (i.e. shareholders) should take into consideration board gender diversity in their investment decision-making processes as the results show that gender diverse boards promote more effective governance, which, in turn, leads to better alignment of R&D investments with shareholder value. Regulators aiming to improve corporate governance policies should encourage gender diversity on the boards. The results align with global initiatives such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly Goal 5 on gender equality. Policymakers may use the findings in this study to advocate for more gender diverse governance structures within corporations. Originality/value This study investigates the role gender diverse boards play in creating value from firms' R&D activities.

R&D investments and corporate carbon emissions: The moderating roles of CEO risk-averse and BOD independence

Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions

The Decision of corporate carbon emission governance: The Mediating role of financial leverage

Regulation-induced financial constraints, carbon emission and corporate innovation: Evidence from China

Analysis of the relationship between investment inefficiency and climate risk and the moderating effects of managerial ownership

Corporate governance and carbon emissions performance: International evidence on curvilinear relationships

Financial Constraints and R&D Investment: the Moderating Role of CEO Characteristics

Corporate governance: Does it matter management of carbon emission performance? An empirical analyses of Indian companies

Directors' and officers' liability insurance and carbon emissions

When R&D investment improves firm value: the role of board gender diversity

The Diminishing Marginal Effect of R&D Input and Carbon Emission Mitigation

Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation

Dynamic Relationship Between Environmental Policy and Technological Innovation: Evidence from Firms in Korean Emission Trading Scheme

Power play in carbon trading market: How status of executives with R&D background incentives companies' low-carbon innovation

Carbon emissions and low-carbon innovation in firms

Accounting Conservatism, R&D Manipulation, and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from China

The impact of directors' foreign experience on corporate carbon emissions: A mediating perspective based on corporate green innovation

The moderating role of good corporate governance on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and real earnings management

Environmental Risk and Credit Ratings, and the Moderating Effect of Market Competition

Corporate Environmental Responsibilities and Executive Compensation: A Risk Management Perspective

Exploring the determinants and long-term performance outcomes of corporate carbon strategies