Abstract:Objective In order to facilitate education for clinical users, performance aspects of the high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) devices were evaluated in the present study. A multidimensional HFNC clinical evaluation system was established accordingly. Materials and Methods Clinical staff from Chinese hospitals were invited to participate in an online questionnaire survey. The questionnaire was mainly about the accuracy of temperature, flow rate, and oxygen concentration of HFNC, as well as its humidification capacity. We also investigated how the clinical staff of different professions made decisions on HFNC evaluation indicators. Based on the results of the questionnaire survey of clinicians with rich experience in using HFNC, the relative weights of temperature accuracy, flow velocity accuracy, oxygen concentration accuracy, and humidification ability of HFNC equipment were calculated by the AHP to establish a clinical evaluation system. Four kinds of common HFNC devices were tested and evaluated, and the clinical performance of the four kinds of HFNC devices was evaluated by the new scoring system. Results A total of 356 clinicians participated in and completed the questionnaire survey. To ensure the reliability of the HFNC evaluation system, we only adopted the questionnaire results of clinicians with rich experience in using HFNCs. Data from 247 questionnaires (80 doctors, 105 nurses, and 62 respiratory therapists [RTs]) were analyzed. A total of 174 participants used HFNC more than once a week; 88.71% of RTs used HFNC ≥ 1 score daily, 62.86% of nurses used HFNC ≥ 1 score daily, and 66.25% of doctors used HFNC ≥ 1 daily. There was no significant difference in the frequency of use between doctors and nurses. Finally, the relative weights of temperature accuracy (0.088), humidification capacity (0.206), flow velocity accuracy (0.311), and oxygen concentration accuracy (0.395) in the HFNC clinical evaluation system were obtained. The relative weights of clinicians with different occupations and the frequency of HFNC use were obtained. After testing four kinds of HFNC devices through the evaluation system, it was found that the four kinds of HFNC devices have different advantages in different clinical performances, and AiRVO 2 has excellent performance with regard to temperature accuracy and humidification ability. HF-75A and NeoHiF-i7 are good at ensuring the stability of oxygen concentration and the accuracy of the flow velocity of the transported gas, while OH-80S is relatively stable in all aspects. Conclusion The clinical evaluation system of HFNC is based on the weight of the experience of clinical personnel with different medical backgrounds. Although the existing practitioners have different educational backgrounds (academic qualifications, majors), our evaluation system can enhance clinical staff’s awareness of HFNC and further optimize the clinical use of HFNC.

Evaluation of the humidification performances of new generation of heated wire humidifiers

Performance of Different Active Humidification Systems in High-Flow Oxygen Therapy

Consequences of Pausing Heated Humidification During Invasive Ventilation

Comparison of Actual Performance in Humidification among Different High-Flow Nasal Cannula Devices: a Bench Study.

Performance of Invasive Mode in Different Heated Humidification Systems With High-Flow Nasal Cannula

Clinical study on artificial airway humidification with two different kinds of ventilator heated humidifier

Double-heater-wire circuits and heat-and-moisture exchangers and the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia

Development of a New Method for Evaluating Heat and Moisture Exchanger Performance

The Humidity in a Low-Flow Dräger Fabius Anesthesia Workstation with or without Thermal Insulation or a Heat and Moisture Exchanger: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Humidification during mechanical ventilation to prevent endotracheal tube occlusion in critically ill patients: A case control study

Mist and water condensation inside incubators reduce the efficacy of phototherapy

Meta analysis on effect of heat moisture exchangers on airway humidification in mechanically ventilated patients

Development of a new membrane-type heated humidifier for laparoscopic surgery

[Efficacy of Heat and Moisture Exchangers and Heated Humidifiers in Preventing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: a Meta-Analysis].

Impacts of Humidification Process on Indoor Thermal Comfort and Air Quality Using Portable Ultrasonic Humidifier

Application and Nursing of Heal and Moisture Exchanger in Tracheotomy Patients

Reassessing the Role of Heated Humidification During Nebulization: Implications for Clinical Practice

Quantifying Aerosol Delivery in Simulated Spontaneously Breathing Patients With Tracheostomy Using Different Humidification Systems With or Without Exhaled Humidity

High-flow nasal cannula: Evaluation of the perceptions of various performance aspects among Chinese clinical staff and establishment of a multidimensional clinical evaluation system

Inspiratory Tube Condensation During High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy: A Bench Study

Study on the effects of different humidifying liquids applied to non-invasive mechanical ventilation airway humidification