Comprehensive typhoon hazard zoning in China based on historical records

Zhao Liu,Liyan Xu,Qing Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2300813
2024-01-10
Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk
Abstract:The formulation of nationwide goals, strategic plans, and specifically zoned areas for typhoon hazard mitigation and prevention is paramount for addressing the threat in a spatially explicit manner. Utilizing historical rainfall and wind speed data associated with typhoon disasters in the Northwest Pacific and South China Sea from 1949 to 2017, we proposed a comprehensive typhoon hazard zoning delineated based on the assessment of typhoon disaster risks, considering hazard-causing factors, hazard-formative environments, and hazard-bearing bodies through an Analytic Hierarchy Process. High-risk areas were primarily located in the coastal regions of South and Southeast China. Medium-risk areas were situated in the Yangtze River Delta and towns adjacent to Bohai Bay. Low-risk areas were primarily located in the central region of Guangxi, the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, the vicinity of Fuzhou, the majority of southern Jiangsu and northern Zhejiang, all of Shanghai, the northern and southern parts of the Shandong Peninsula, the area around Bohai Bay in Tianjin, a minor portion of Hebei, and the three northeastern provinces. Appropriate mitigation measures were proposed to address the threats posed by typhoons in these regions. This information is instrumental in providing reliable support for China in addressing the challenges posed by typhoons.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,meteorology & atmospheric sciences,water resources
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the problem of zonal assessment of typhoon disasters in China, so as to provide a scientific basis for formulating disaster prevention and mitigation strategies nationwide. Specifically, the research aims to: 1. **Comprehensive typhoon disaster zoning based on historical data**: Utilize the historical records of typhoons (including data such as rainfall and wind speed) in the Northwest Pacific and the South China Sea from 1949 to 2017, evaluate the typhoon disaster risk through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and conduct spatial zoning in combination with Geographic Information System (GIS) technology. 2. **Consider multiple influencing factors**: In the evaluation process, factors such as hazard - causing factors (such as strong winds and heavy rain), disaster - forming environments (such as terrain, vegetation cover, and water system conditions), and disaster - bearing bodies (such as population density, economic density, farmland production potential, and road network density) are comprehensively considered to ensure the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the evaluation results. 3. **Propose targeted disaster reduction measures**: According to different risk - level areas, corresponding disaster prevention and mitigation measures are proposed, especially for high - risk areas, to enhance the disaster - resistance ability of these areas. ### Research Background and Significance As a country located along the Western Pacific, China is frequently affected by typhoons. From 1949 to 2017, the Northwest Pacific and the South China Sea experienced more than 1,600 typhoons, with an average of 25 per year, most of which landed in China, causing serious economic losses and social impacts. The direct economic losses increased from about 10 billion yuan per year in the 1990s to 30 billion yuan in the early 21st century. In the context of global climate change, the increase in sea - surface temperature may intensify typhoon intensity and increase the storm frequency in specific ocean basins. Therefore, a comprehensive zonal assessment of typhoon disasters in China not only helps to understand the current risk distribution but also provides an important reference for future urban planning and disaster management, especially in dealing with the challenges brought by climate change. ### Method Overview 1. **Data Sources**: Use the typhoon track data from 1949 to 2017 provided by the Northwest Pacific Tropical Cyclone Data Center of the China Meteorological Administration, as well as the daily wind speed and rainfall data of 577 meteorological stations from 1949 to 2017. 2. **Methods**: Adopt the AHP method to construct a multi - indicator typhoon disaster zoning model, considering the indicator systems of four levels: hazard - causing factors, disaster - forming environments, disaster - bearing bodies, and disaster resilience. Determine the weights of each indicator through expert questionnaires, and use linear transformation to standardize the original data, and finally calculate the comprehensive risk index. 3. **Results**: Overlay the standardized indicators according to their weights to generate a national typhoon disaster comprehensive evaluation index layer, and divide the comprehensive risk values into five levels according to the Natural Breaks Classification (Jenks): extremely high - risk area, high - risk area, medium - risk area, low - risk area, and extremely low - risk area. ### Conclusions Through the above research, the paper provides a scientific basis for the zonal assessment of typhoon disasters in China, which is helpful for formulating more effective disaster prevention and mitigation strategies, especially in high - risk areas. At the same time, the research also introduces the concept of climate - change - adaptive resilient city zoning, further enhancing the city's ability to cope with typhoon disasters. ### Formula Display When calculating the standardized values, the following formulas are used: \[ M_{ij} = \frac{N_{ij} - N_{i\text{min}}}{N_{i\text{max}} - N_{i\text{min}}} \quad (1) \] \[ M_{ij} = 1 - \frac{N_{ij} - N_{i\text{min}}}{N_{i\text{max}} - N_{i\text{min}}} \quad (2) \] where: - \( M_{ij} \) is the standardized value of indicator layer \( i \) in affected layer \( j \) - \( N_{ij} \) is the original value of indicator layer \( i \) in affected layer \( j \) - \( N_{i\text{min}} \) and \( N_{i\text{max}} \) are the minimum and maximum values of indicator layer \( i \), respectively The formula for calculating the comprehensive risk index \( Z \) is: \[ Z = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} M_{ij} \times W_{ij} \quad (3) \]