COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAUDAL CLONIDINE WITH ROPIVACAINE VERSUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE WITH ROPIVACAINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

Jyesthraj V Patangankar,Pramod Bhale,Anukrishna K V,Rafson C Jani,Sanhita J Kulkarni,Sudipta Mohapatra
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36106/ijar/7600694
2023-09-01
Indian Journal Of Applied Research
Abstract:Background: Regional anaesthesia reduces the intraoperative requirement of inhaled and intravenous anaesthetic agents and offers a faster return to the conscious preoperative state. The caudal epidural technique is very popular, safe and reliable in paediatric regional anaesthesia. To compare the duration of postope Objective: rative analgesia and hemodynamic stability in a caudal block using Clonidine 1mcg/kg with Ropivacaine (0.25%) versus dexmedetomidine (1mcg/kg) with Ropivacaine (0.25%) in paediatric age group. After taking valid written informed consent from parents, a prospective randomized Methods: double-blinded clinical study was conducted on 84 children over a period of 2 years. Subjects with ASA grade 1 and 2, aged 2-6 years scheduled for elective infraumbilical surgeries were randomized into two groups each with 42 subjects-group RC received caudal 0.25% Ropivacaine 1 ml/kg with Clonidine 1μg/kg and group RD received caudal 0.25 % Ropivacaine 1ml/kg with Dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg. These were compared in terms of age, sex, duration, distribution and duration of surgery. The parameters studied were intraoperative hemodynamic changes, duration of postoperative analgesia and incidence of complications. 0.25% Ropivacaine 1ml/kg with Dexmedetomidine 1μg/kg in Conclusion: caudal block signicantly prolongs the duration of analgesia compared to 0.25% Ropivacaine 1ml/kg with clonidine 1 mcg/kg, without adverse effects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?