Abstract:The low-carbon transformation is a broad and profound systemic change that will inevitably impact many areas of the urban environment, economy, and social system. We evaluated the impact of China's ongoing "low-carbon pilot policy" on urban housing prices as a "quasi-natural experiment." Existing research findings and hedonic theory predictions suggest that the low-carbon city pilot (LCCP) policy is increasing urban housing prices through air quality improvements. However, this study contradicts these speculations based on the situation in China. This study employed the analytical framework of staggered difference-in-differences (DID), which revealed that the LCCP policy had generally reduced housing prices; the implementation of the policy had led to an average decrease of 6.2% in housing prices in pilot cities, compared to non-pilot cities. The LCCP policy affected housing prices by influencing both the "demand side" and "supply side" of housing. In terms of the demand side, the policy significantly reduced the level of urban air pollution but did not impact housing prices. Instead, it negatively affected housing prices by lowering labor wages. In terms of the supply side, housing prices were negatively affected, mainly by increasing the cost of emission reduction of real estate enterprises, which impacted the original longstanding housing production process. Additionally, there were significant differences in the impact of the LCCP policy on housing prices in cities across different geographical locations and different tiers of cities. This study suggests important policy insights for achieving stable market housing prices and promoting high-quality urban development in the process of low-carbon transformation.

Cities’ low-carbon transformation and labor income share of companies: evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China

How do low-carbon city pilots affect carbon emissions? Staggered difference in difference evidence from Chinese firms

Can the Low-Carbon Transition Impact the Urban–Rural Income Gap? Empirical Evidence from the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy

The Increasing Climate Inequalities of Urban Carbon Emissions: the Distributional Effect of Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy

Changes in the labor share of enterprises under the green and low-carbon transition: Empirical evidence from China's carbon emission trading pilot

Can low-carbon cities increase urban housing prices? Evidence from China's low-carbon city pilot

Impact of the Low-Carbon City Pilot Project on China's Land Transfers in High Energy-Consuming Industries

Does Low-Carbon City Construction Improve Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

Can the low-carbon city pilot policy promote firms’ low-carbon innovation: Evidence from China

The policy outcomes of low-carbon city construction on urban green development: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment conducted in China

Analyzing the impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on enterprises' labor demand: Evidence from China

Can low-carbon cities pilot policy promote enterprise sustainable development? Quasi-experimental evidence from China

Low-carbon city pilot policy, fiscal pressure, and carbon productivity: Evidence from china

Heterogeneous effects of China's low-carbon city pilots policy

Carbon reduction policy and firms' executive‐employee pay gap: Evidence from low‐carbon city pilot policy

Has the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy Reduced Urban Carbon Emissions in China?

Can low-carbon city pilot policies improve urban energy efficiency? evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Climate policy in emerging economies: Evidence from China’s Low-Carbon City Pilot

Evaluating the Impact of Low-Carbon Urban Policy on Corporate Green Innovation—Evidence from China's National Low-Carbon City Strategy Program

Estimating heterogeneous effects of China’s low-carbon pilot city policy on urban employment

Carbon reduction and corporate sustainability: Evidence from low-carbon city pilot policy