Abstract:Forschungsfrage Gibt es Unterschiede in der Häufigkeit eines Gestationsdiabetes (GDM) zwischen Frauen mit selbst definiertem Flüchtlingsstatus (sdFS), Immigrantinnen und in Deutschland geborenen Frauen? Unterscheiden sich die Perinataldaten von Frauen mit GDM in Abhängigkeit vom Vorliegen eines Migrationsstatus? Methodik Im Rahmen der Pregnancy and Obstetric Care for Refugees (ProRef)-Studie wurden zwischen Juni 2020 und April 2022 an drei Berliner Perinatalzentren entbundene Frauen mit einer adaptierten Version des Migrant Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire (MFMCQ) befragt und ihre Perinataldaten erhoben. Die Daten zu GDM abhängig vom Migrationsstatus wurden statistisch ausgewertet. Ergebnisse Frauen mit sdFS wurden signifikant seltener auf GDM getestet (3,2%; p=0,0025) als Immigrantinnen (1,4%) oder in Deutschland geborene Frauen (0,6%). Immigrantinnen hatten häufiger (19,6%, p=0,001) einen GDM als in Deutschland geborene Frauen (15,0%) und Frauen mit sdFS (14,1%). Die Häufigkeit an GDM unterschied sich stark je nach Herkunftsland der Immigrantinnen. Die Herkunftsländer Vietnam (OR 3,41) und Türkei (OR 2,18) führen, korrigiert für Alter und BMI, zu einer Risikoerhöhung für das Vorliegen eines GDM. Insgesamt unterscheiden sich die Perinataldaten bei Frauen mit GDM zwischen Frauen mit sdFS, Immigrantinnen und in Deutschland geborenen Frauen nicht. Schlussfolgerung Dass Frauen mit sdFS signifikant seltener auf GDM getestet werden, deutet möglicherweise auf eine Versorgungslücke hin. Allerdings zeigen sich für Frauen mit sdFS keine schlechteren perinatalen und peripartalen Ergebnisdaten. Frauen mit sdFS sollten dennoch konsequent auf GDM getestet werden. Die Ursachen für starke Unterschiede in der GDM-Häufigkeit je nach Herkunftsland sind ungeklärt. Research question Are there differences in the frequency of gestational diabetes between women of self-defined refugee status (SDRS), immigrant women, and women born in Germany? Does the perinatal data of women with gestational diabetes (GDM) differ depending on the migration status? Method For the Pregnancy and Obstetric Care for Refugees (ProRef) study between June 2020 and April 2022, data was collected with the Migrant Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire (MFMCQ) among women on the postpartum ward in three perinatal centers in Berlin. The data concerning GDM was statistically analyzed. Results Women of SDRS were tested for GDM (3.2%, p=0.0025) significantly less often than immigrant women (1.4%) or women born in Germany (0.6%). The rate of GDM was higher among immigrant women (19.6%, p=0.001) than among women born in Germany (15.0%) and women of SDRS (14.1%). The rate of GDM varied depending on the country of origin. Vietnam (OR 3.41) and Turkey (OR 2.18) as countries of origin, corrected for age and body mass index, increased the chance of gestational diabetes. The perinatal outcome data among women with GDM did not differ depending on the migration status. Conclusion As women of SDRS are tested for GDM less frequently, this potentially suggests a supply gap in the health care system. However, the perinatal outcome data does not differ for women of SDRS. Received: 27 June 2023 Accepted: 29 December 2023 Article published online: 19 February 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Perinatal outcome of immigrant women with and without refugee status compared to non-immigrant women: results of the pregnancy and obstetric care for refugees (PROREF) cross-sectional study

Perinatal Outcomes of Immigrant Mothers and Their Infants Born Very Preterm across Germany

Obstetric care quality indicators and outcomes based on the degree of acculturation of immigrants-results from a cross-sectional study in Berlin

The association of pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity with delivery outcomes: a comparison of immigrant and non-immigrant women in Berlin, Germany

Geburtsmedizinische Versorgung bei Gestationsdiabetes von geflüchteten und immigrierten Frauen im Vergleich zu nicht-immigrierten Frauen in Berlin: Eine Analyse quantitativer Daten der Pregnancy and Obstetric Care for Refugees (PROREF)-Studie

Trends and disparities in perinatal health outcomes among women from refugee backgrounds in Victoria, Australia: A population-based study

Are all immigrant mothers really at risk of low birth weight and perinatal mortality? The crucial role of socio-economic status

Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes of Refugee Infants in a Tertiary Hospital in Turkey

Maternal birthplace and experiences of perinatal healthcare in Belgium: Evidence from a cross-sectional survey

Pregnancy outcomes in asylum seekers in the North of the Netherlands: a retrospective documentary analysis

Contribution of overweight and obesity to adverse pregnancy outcomes among immigrant and non-immigrant women in Berlin, Germany

Comparing provision and appropriateness of health care between immigrants and non-immigrants in Germany using the example of neuraxial anaesthesia during labour: cross-sectional study

Are pregnancy outcomes affected by the lack of legal status? A demographic study based on 850,288 live births in Switzerland

At risk of reproductive disadvantage? Exploring fertility awareness among migrant women in Germany

Out of pocket health-care services in Germany during pregnancy under consideration of migration and acculturation

Association of maternal migrant background with inflammation during pregnancy - Results of a birth cohort study in Germany

Inter-Generational Differences in Perinatal Health Behaviours: A Secondary Analysis of the Born in Bradford Cohort, Disentangling Ethnicity and Migration

Comparison of the adolescent pregnancy outcomes between refugees and Turkish citizens

Pregnancy outcomes of forced migrants in the Netherlands: A national registry-based study

Caesarean sections and breastfeeding initiation among migrants in Switzerland

Neighborhood Disadvantage and Birth Outcomes Among Refugees