Technological and Physical–Chemical Evaluation of Cotton Gauzes Impregnated with Semisolid Preparations for Wound Healing

Fabrizio Villapiano,Ritamaria Di Lorenzo,Rosa Sparaco,Elisa Magli,Francesco Frecentese,Sonia Laneri,Alessandra D'Orsi,Valeria Nele,Marco Biondi,Laura Mayol,Virginia Campani,Vincenzo Santagada,Giuseppe De Rosa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12040777
IF: 4.757
2024-04-02
Biomedicines
Abstract:Chronic wounds are marked by an extended healing period during which damaged tissues fail to undergo orderly and timely repair. Examples of chronic wounds encompass venous ulcers, pressure ulcers, and diabetic foot ulcers. The process of wound healing is complex and dynamic, relying on the interplay and response among various cells and mediators. In this study, four marketed wound dressing products based on cotton gauzes impregnated with different semisolid products (namely Betadine® 10%, Connettivina® Bio Plus Fitostimoline® Plus, and Non-Ad® gauzes) have been characterized for their physicochemical properties and ex vivo behaviors. More in detail, the pH and rheological features of semisolid formulations impregnating the gauzes were analyzed along with their ability to adhere to the gauzes. The most promising ones were selected and compared in ex vivo experiments on fresh pig skin. The pH measurements showed an acidic environment for all the tested solutions, albeit with variations in mean values, ranging from 2.66 to 4.50. The outcomes of rheological studies demonstrated that all the semisolid preparations impregnating the gauzes exhibited a pseudoplastic behavior, with significant differences in the pseudoplasticity index across the preparations, which is likely to influence their ability to adhere to the gauze. A rheological study in oscillatory mode revealed rheological behavior typical of a viscous solution only for the cream impregnating non-paraffin gauzes. The other products exhibited rheological behavior typical of a weak gel, which is expected to be advantageous as regards the capability of the semisolid preparation to create and maintain the space within the wound and to provide protection to the injured tissue. Results of ex vivo experiments demonstrated that Fitostimoline® Plus was more effective than Connettivina® Bio Plus in promoting both skin hydration and energy.
biochemistry & molecular biology,medicine, research & experimental,pharmacology & pharmacy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to address the issue of evaluating the performance of four commercially available wound dressings (products based on cotton gauze impregnated with different semi-solid formulations) in terms of their physicochemical properties and technical performance, to better understand how these properties affect the wound healing process. Specifically, the study focuses on the following products: 1. **Betadine® 10% Gauze**: Impregnated with 10% povidone-iodine solution. 2. **Connettivina® Bio Plus Gauze**: Impregnated with a semi-solid formulation of low molecular weight sodium hyaluronate and silver sulfadiazine. 3. **Fitostimoline® Plus Gauze**: Contains a semi-solid formulation of Rigenase® and polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB). 4. **Non-Ad® Gauze**: Impregnated with petroleum jelly and liquid paraffin. The main objectives of the study include: - **pH Measurement**: To evaluate the acidity or alkalinity of the semi-solid formulations, as pH values have a significant impact on the wound healing process. - **Rheological Testing**: To analyze the viscosity, elasticity, and thixotropy of the semi-solid formulations, as these properties affect the formulation's ability to adhere to the gauze and its release behavior on the skin. - **In Vitro Experiments**: Using fresh pig skin to assess the ability of different dressings to promote skin hydration and energy recovery. Through these analyses, the study aims to determine which dressing performs best in promoting wound healing and to provide scientific evidence for clinical application.